Cited by 108Celiac Disease Research and ManagementWheat and Barley Genetics and PathologyEosinophilic Esophagitis

Potential Celiac Children: 9-Year Follow-Up on a Gluten-Containing Diet

Auricchio, Renata, Tosco, Antonella, Piccolo, Emanuela, Galatola, Martina, Izzo, Valentina, Maglio, Mariantonia, Paparo, Francesco, Troncone, Riccardo +1 more·2014·American Journal of Gastroenterology

Abstract

Objectives Potential celiac disease (CD) is defined by the presence of serum anti-tissue-transglutaminase (anti-TG2) antibodies and normal duodenal mucosa. The major clinical problem is the management of asymptomatic patients and how to predict the development of villous atrophy. This prospective longitudinal cohort study describes the natural history of potential CD up to 9 years and explores risk factors associated with the development of mucosal damage. Methods Two hundred and ten potential CD children were eligible for the study; 175/210 asymptomatic children were left on a gluten-containing diet. Antibodies and clinical symptoms were checked every 6 months, and a small bowel biopsy was taken every 2 years to evaluate histological, immunohistochemical, and anti-TG2 deposits. Patients were genotyped for HLA and a set of non-HLA CD-associated genes. Results Forty-three percent of patients showed persistently elevated anti-TG2 level, 20% became negative during follow-up, and 37% showed a fluctuant anti-TG2 course with transiently negative values. At 3 years of follow-up, 86% of cases remained potential; 73 and 67% still had normal duodenal architecture at 6 and 9 years, respectively. Male sex, slight mucosal inflammation at time 0, and a peculiar genetic profile delineate a cohort of individuals who were prone to develop mucosal damage during time. Conclusions A sizeable proportion of asymptomatic potential celiac patients showed fluctuation or negativization of antibody pro…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ajg.2014.77

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Auricchio, R., Tosco, A., Piccolo, E., Galatola, M., Izzo, V., Maglio, M., Paparo, F., Troncone, R., & Greco, L.
Affiliations
University of Naples Federico II (IT)
Corresponding author
Auricchio, Renata
Venue
American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2014-06
Volume
109
Issue
6
Pages
913-921
ISSN
0002-9270 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2082847038
Cited by
108
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 3
FWCI
12.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The American Journal of Gastroenterology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Celiac Disease Research and Management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Eosinophilic Esophagitis
Keywords
anti-tissue transglutaminase antibodies, gluten-containing diet, villous atrophy, duodenal injury, natural history (disease), risk factors, HLA typing, gluten-free diet, children
MeSH terms
Protein Glutamine gamma Glutamyltransferase 2, Adolescent, Autoantibodies, Biopsy, Celiac Disease, Child, Child, Preschool, Diet, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Genotype, Glutens, HLA-DQ Antigens, Humans, Immunoglobulin A, Immunohistochemistry, Infant, Intestinal Mucosa, Male, Prognosis, Prospective Studies, Transglutaminases, Risk Factors, Cohort Studies, GTP-Binding Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review