Racism and hypertension: a review of the empirical evidence and implications for clinical practice
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Despite improved hypertension (HTN) awareness and treatment, racial disparities in HTN prevalence persist. An understanding of the biopsychosocial determinants of HTN is necessary to address racial disparities in the prevalence of HTN. This review examines the evidence directly and indirectly linking multiple levels of racism to HTN. METHODS: Published empirical research in EBSCO databases investigating the relationships of three levels of racism (individual/interpersonal, internalized, and institutional racism) to HTN was reviewed. RESULTS: Direct evidence linking individual/interpersonal racism to HTN diagnosis is weak. However, the relationship of individual/interpersonal racism to ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) is more consistent, with all published studies reporting a positive relationship of interpersonal racism to ABP. There is no direct evidence linking internalized racism to BP. Population-based studies provide some evidence linking institutional racism, in the forms of residential racial segregation (RRS) and incarceration, to HTN incidence. Racism shows associations to stress exposure and reactivity as well as associations to established HTN-related risk factors including obesity, low levels of physical activity and alcohol use. The effects vary by level of racism. CONCLUSIONS: Overall the findings suggest that racism may increase risk for HTN; these effects emerge more clearly for institutional racism than for individual level racism. All levels of racism may influence the prevalence of HTN via stress exposure and reactivity and by fostering conditions that undermine health behaviors, raising the barriers to lifestyle change.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 127 · Cited by 232
- Authors
- Brondolo, E., Love, E. E., Pencille, M., Schoenthaler, A., & Ogedegbe, G.
- Affiliations
- St. John's University (US)
- NYU Langone Health (US)
- Venue
- American Journal of Hypertension
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-05-01
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 518-529
- ISSN
- 0895-7061 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-7225
- OpenAlex
- W2093501462
- Cited by
- 232
- References
- 127
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 7.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- American Journal of Hypertension (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- University Libraries (University of Maryland) (submittedVersion)
- Digital Repository at the University of Maryland (University of Maryland College Park)
- Funders
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL068590, R01HL078566, R01HL087301, R01HL68590)
- National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (P60MD003421)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
- Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
- Keywords
- racism, hypertension, racial disparities, institutional racism, internalized racism, interpersonal racism, incarceration, ambulatory blood pressure, stress exposure, stress reactivity, obesity, physical activity, alcohol consumption, health behavior, biopsychosocial factors
- MeSH terms
- Black or African American, Humans, Hypertension, Prejudice, Social Class, Healthcare Disparities
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review