Cited by 96Cardiovascular Health and Disease PreventionBlood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesCardiovascular and exercise physiology

Watermelon extract supplementation reduces ankle blood pressure and carotid augmentation index in obese adults with prehypertension or hypertension

Figueroa, A., Sanchez-Gonzalez, M. A., Wong, A., Arjmandi, B. H.·2012·American Journal of Hypertension

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ankle-brachial index (ABI) and ankle blood pressure (BP) are associated with increased carotid wave reflection (augmentation index, AIx). Oral L-citrulline and L-arginine from synthetic or watermelon sources have reduced brachial BP, aortic BP, and aortic AIx. A directly measured carotid AIx (cAIx) rather than aortic AIx has been proposed as a better measurement of central AIx. We evaluated the effects of watermelon extract on ankle BP and cAIx in individuals with normal ABI and prehypertension or stage 1 hypertension. METHODS: Ankle and brachial systolic BP (SBP), diastolic BP (DBP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), cAIx, ABI, and heart rate (HR) were evaluated in the supine position in 14 adults (11 women/3 men, age 58 ± 1 years) with prehypertension or stage 1 hypertension (153 ± 4 mm Hg). Subjects were randomly assigned to 6 weeks of watermelon extract supplementation (L-citrulline/L-arginine, 6 g daily) or placebo followed by a 2-week washout period and then crossover. RESULTS: Ankle and brachial SBP (-11.5 ± 3.8 and -15.1 ± 2.8 mm Hg), DBP (-7.8 ± 2.3 and -7.6 ± 1.8 mm Hg), and MAP (-9.8 ± 2.6 and -7.3 ± 1.8 mm Hg), and cAIx (-8.8 ± 2.6 %) decreased significantly (P < 0.05) after watermelon supplementation compared to placebo. Watermelon supplementation had no significant effect (P > 0.05) on ABI and HR. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that watermelon extract supplementation reduces ankle BP, brachial BP, and carotid wave reflection in obese middle-aged adults with prehypertension or stage 1 hypertension and normal ABI, which may reflect improved arterial function.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ajh.2012.20

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 20 · Cited by 96

Authors
Figueroa, A., Sanchez-Gonzalez, M. A., Wong, A., & Arjmandi, B. H.
Affiliations
Florida State University (US)
Corresponding author
Figueroa, A.
Venue
American Journal of Hypertension
Published
2012-06-01
Volume
25
Issue
6
Pages
640-643
ISSN
  • 0895-7061 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-7225
OpenAlex
W2044915048
Cited by
96
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Hypertension (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
citrulline, L-arginine, hypertension, prehypertension, ankle pressure, carotid augmentation index, wave reflection, ankle-brachial index, arterial function, adult obesity, dietary supplementation
MeSH terms
Administration, Oral, Arginine, Blood Pressure, Brachial Artery, Carotid Arteries, Citrulline, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Hypertension, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Plant Extracts, Comorbidity, Citrullus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review