The DOI matches its Crossref record; 70 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Graphene membranes for water desalination
Open accessAbstract
Extensive environmental pollution caused by worldwide industrialization and population growth has led to a water shortage. This problem lowers the quality of human life and wastes a large amount of money worldwide each year due to the related consequences. One main solution for this challenge is water purification. State-of-the-art water purification necessitates the implementation of novel materials and technologies that are cost and energy efficient. In this regard, graphene nanomaterials, with their unique physicochemical properties, are an optimum choice. These materials offer extraordinarily high surface area, mechanical durability, atomic thickness, nanosized pores and reactivity toward polar and non-polar water pollutants. These characteristics impart high selectivity and water permeability, and thus provide excellent water purification efficiency. This review introduces the potential of graphene membranes for water desalination. Although literature reviews have mostly concerned graphene’s capability for the adsorption and photocatalysis of water pollutants, updated knowledge related to its sieving properties is quite limited. Water desalination plants stand to markedly reduce their energy consumption once nanoporous graphene-based membranes are optimized. Purifying brackish water with reverse osmosis works most efficiently when membranes are as thin, selective and strong as possible. Mady Elbahri from Aalto University in Finland reviews efforts to achieve these goals using graphene monolayers perforated with nanoscale pores. Recent roll-to-roll fabrications of graphene onto polymer supports show that inexpensive, large-scale production of these ultrathin membranes is feasible. It remains challenging, however, to tailor the nanochannels and selectivity of single-atom-thick material. An alternative may be to switch to multilayered graphene oxide membranes. These substances can be engineered with different molecular cross-linking agents between each carbon layer, opening room to insert negatively charged functional groups that target and electrostatically repel sodium ions. Graphene nanomaterials hold great promise for the development of advanced water purification membranes, especially for water desalination. Their atomic thickness, extraordinary mechanical stability and potential for size-selective transport are ideal features, encouraging the membrane scientist across the world to investigate their applicability for water desalination. Graphene can potentially desalinate water either as monolayer or as multilayer membranes. In this review, we discuss these different classes of graphene membranes and highlight their merits and shortcomings. In addition, the theory behind their performance is presented in detail.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Geim, A. K., & Novoselov, K. S. (2007) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat1849 · Cited by 39,979
Particle mesh Ewald: An N ⋅log( N ) method for Ewald sums in large systems
Darden, T., York, D., & Pedersen, L. (1993) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.464397 · Cited by 30,546
Superior Thermal Conductivity of Single-Layer Graphene
Balandin, A. A., Ghosh, S., Bao, W., Calizo, I., Teweldebrhan, D., Miao, F., & Lau, C. N. (2008) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/nl0731872 · Cited by 13,823
The chemistry of graphene oxide
Dreyer, D. R., Park, S., Bielawski, C. W., & Ruoff, R. S. (2010) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/b917103g · Cited by 11,653
Science and technology for water purification in the coming decades
Shannon, M. A., Bohn, P. W., Elimelech, M., Georgiadis, J. G., Mariñas, B. J., & Mayes, A. M. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06599 · Cited by 8,465
Roll-to-roll production of 30-inch graphene films for transparent electrodes
Bae, S., Kim, H., Lee, Y., Xu, X., Park, J.-S., Zheng, Y., Balakrishnan, J., Lei, T., Ri Kim, H., Song, Y. I., et al. (2010) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2010.132 · Cited by 8,136
The Future of Seawater Desalination: Energy, Technology, and the Environment
Elimelech, M., & Phillip, W. A. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1200488 · Cited by 6,711
Preparation and characterization of graphene oxide paper
Dikin, D. A., Stankovich, S., Zimney, E. J., Piner, R. D., Dommett, G. H. B., Evmenenko, G., Nguyen, S. T., & Ruoff, R. S. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06016 · Cited by 5,594
Unimpeded Permeation of Water Through Helium-Leak–Tight Graphene-Based Membranes
Nair, R. R., Wu, H. A., Jayaram, P. N., Grigorieva, I. V., & Geim, A. K. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1211694 · Cited by 3,073
Impermeable Atomic Membranes from Graphene Sheets
Bunch, J. S., Verbridge, S. S., Alden, J. S., van der Zande, A. M., Parpia, J. M., Craighead, H. G., & McEuen, P. L. (2008) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/nl801457b · Cited by 2,919
Cited by
2D materials as an emerging platform for nanopore-based power generation
Macha, M., Marion, S., Nandigana, V. V. R., & Radenovic, A. (2019) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/s41578-019-0126-z · Cited by 426
Metadata
- Authors
- Homaeigohar, S., & Elbahri, M.
- Venue
- NPG Asia Materials
- Published
- 2017-08
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- e427-e427
- ISSN
- 1884-4049 (ISSN-L)
- 1884-4057
- OpenAlex
- W2747681850
- Cited by
- 444
- References
- 70
- FWCI
- 21.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Graphene membranes for water desalination. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/am.2017.135
- The paper
- Homaeigohar, S., & Elbahri, M. (2017). Graphene membranes for water desalination. NPG Asia Materials. https://doi.org/10.1038/am.2017.135
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.