Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 669

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Growth Kinetics of Tumours

Open access
Lord, B I·1978·British Journal of Cancer

Abstract

This book reviews a workshop held in Geneva in 1977 to discuss the pathogenesis of human breast cancer in relation to hormonal status, immunologic status and possible viral aetiology. Approaches to breast-cancer screening were also discussed in the light of known epidemiological data. In addition, growth rate in association with hormonal receptor status, and the more general topic of the preferred experimental animal systems for the study of human breast cancer were discussed in some detail. The contributors represent a formidable array of experts within their own fields in relation to breast cancer, and this is reflected in the quality of the review and subsequent discussion. Overall, this short booklet, with its excellent bibliography, represents a concise summary of present-day biological thinking in the development of human breast cancer, and points to future areas of potential interest in viral and hormonal pathogenesis and host immuno-reactivity. A good feature of this book is that its author is realistic, always ready to admit that tumour-cell kinetics are not yet the saviour of the cancer therapist. Particularly welcome is that the author is always careful to examine the problems, both practical and theoretical, is constantly aware of the danger of intro-lucing artefact, and makes clear and precise statements of his use of often ambiguous terminology. A glossary of terms at the end is a valuable appendix. On the whole it is well written and in good English, though there is a disturbing number of uncorrected printer's errors. From the outset Steel makes clear that frequently passaged transplanted tumours are of very doubtful value in analysing the relationship of tumour-cell kinetics to cancer treatment. Consequently, a large part of the book is devoted to reviewing the kinetics of human and primary experimental tumours. In a logical and incisive manner, the chaotic mass of the results emerges. The author maintains some optimism, but concludes that "Until progress has been made in refining cell-kinetic measurements, it is much too early to assess their potential impact on treatment". Demonstrations of the virtual impossibility of measuring tumour growth-rate, the gross variations in inter-mitotic times in tumour cells, problems in measuring growth fraction and cell-loss factors, all add weight to the validity of both this statement and another: "unrewarding to attempt to predict. .. on the basis of... labelling index, growth fraction or cell cycle-time". Steel is at his happiest when he can enlist the aid of mathematics, and …

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/bjc.1978.97

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 669

Metadata

Authors
Lord, B. I.
Venue
British Journal of Cancer
Published
1978-04
Volume
37
Issue
4
Pages
648-649
ISSN
  • 0007-0920 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-1827
OpenAlex
W2022438822
Cited by
669
References
0
Type
book review
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Growth Kinetics of Tumours. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/bjc.1978.97
The paper
Lord, B. I. (1978). Growth Kinetics of Tumours. British Journal of Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1978.97

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.