Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 2,198

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

WHO Handbook for Reporting Results of Cancer Treatment

Open access
Palmer, M K·1982·British Journal of Cancer

Abstract

pages on lung carcinoma, and Taxy & Battifora's 70 pages on soft-tissue tumours (each with an impressive reference list of almost 200 citations) will be welcomed by workers in these fields as major reviews. The tumour theme is further explored in a shorter but none the less pertinent and valuable account of prostatic carcinoma by Tannen-baum & Tannenbaum, a chapter interesting for its inclusion of scanning EM as a diagnostically useful technique in an area where the transmission mode predominates. Churg, Spargo, Sakaguchi & Jones' detailed appraisal of one of the earliest and most important areas of application ("Diagnostic Electron Microscopy of Renal Disease") is a substantial account of over 100 pages and is lavishly illustrated (most illustrations being of full-page size). It will be essential reading for any histopathologist encountering renal material, though, despite its title, the chapter omits neoplastic conditions of the kidney. Wood & Hu's "Diagnostic Electron Microscopy of the Skin", covers neoplastic and non-neoplastic conditions. This is an excellent treatment of the subject, with some exceptionally fine illustrations. The volume culminates in a comprehensive treatment by Bloodworth, Horvath & Kovacs on the "Fine Structural Pathology of the Endocrine Sys-tem". This chapter, in keeping intellectually and presentationally with the rest of the volume, must be considered a significant contribution to this field. "Diagnostic Electron Microscopy volume 3", in summary, will provide histopatholo-gists with access to or an interest in electron microscopy with authoritative treatments of several major areas of tumour and non-tumour application: it will be particularly welcomed by those specializing in neoplasia. The price of over £50 cannot be considered high for such a quality volume of over 500 pages. B. EDEN New Frontiers in Mammary Pathology. It is the proceedings of a symposium held in Paris in December, 1979 and had reached the bookshops in 1981 at the exhorbitant price of £39.50. The papers were all by invited speakers (9 from France; 2 from Belgium; 2 from U.S.A.; one each from U.K. and Switzerland) and, whilst some of the work described was recent or in progress, many of the "frontiers" being reviewed were passed well before the conference took place. Indeed in some sections, e.g. those on "The Natural History of Benign Breast Tumours" and on "Cystosarcoma phyllodes", there are no new ideas or observations at all, merely pedestrian accounts which would scarcely be adequate in a standard text book. There is little in this …

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/bjc.1982.83

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 2,198

Metadata

Authors
Palmer, M. K.
Venue
British Journal of Cancer
Published
1982-03
Volume
45
Issue
3
Pages
484-485
ISSN
  • 0007-0920 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-1827
OpenAlex
W2028269517
Cited by
2,198
References
0
Type
book review
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: WHO Handbook for Reporting Results of Cancer Treatment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/bjc.1982.83
The paper
Palmer, M. K. (1982). WHO Handbook for Reporting Results of Cancer Treatment. British Journal of Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1982.83

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.