The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Response of patients in phase II studies of chemotherapy in ovarian cancer: implications for patient treatment and the design of phase II trials
Open accessAbstract
Results using the same drug in phase II studies of treatment in ovarian cancer vary widely. An analysis of five phase II studies with a total of 93 patients was carried out to determine whether factors other than the efficacy of the drug affect response. The drugs for the phase II studies were chosen on the basis of in vitro activity or previous activity in humans. Univariate analysis showed that several factors were of significance in predicting response. The most significant was interval from the end of previous treatment to entry into a phase II study. Others were the original presenting stage of the patient, the second line treatment given and the best previous response to therapy. In multivariate analysis, however, only two factors were shown to be of importance which were interval and the FIGO stage of the patient. Using these two variables the discriminant analysis predicted 89% of those who did not respond and 75% of those who did, with an overall correct prediction of 85%. The importance of interval is emphasised by the observation that the response rate for those patients who progressed on treatment or who relapsed within 3-6 months of primary therapy had a response rate of less than 10%. Future phase II studies should probably exclude patients in this category, since the chance of their responding is very low.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Colombo, N., Sessa, C., du Bois, A., Ledermann, J., McCluggage, W. G., McNeish, I., Morice, P., Pignata, S., Ray-Coquard, I., Vergote, I., et al. (2019) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdz062 · Cited by 1,197
“Platinum resistant” ovarian cancer: What is it, who to treat and how to measure benefit?
Davis, A., Tinker, A. V., & Friedlander, M. (2014) · Gynecologic Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.02.038 · Cited by 433
Creemers, G. J., Bolis, G., Gore, M., Scarfone, G., Lacave, A. J., Guastalla, J. P., Despax, R., Favalli, G., Kreinberg, R., Van Belle, S., et al. (1996) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.1996.14.12.3056 · Cited by 377
Moore, K. N., O'Malley, D. M., Vergote, I., Martin, L. P., Gonzalez-Martin, A., Malek, K., & Birrer, M. J. (2018) · Gynecologic Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.07.017 · Cited by 82
Gladieff, L., Ferrero, A., De Rauglaudre, G., Brown, C., Vasey, P., Reinthaller, A., Pujade-Lauraine, E., Reed, N., Lorusso, D., Siena, S., et al. (2012) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdr441 · Cited by 69
Metadata
- Authors
- Blackledge, G., Lawton, F., Redman, C., & Kelly, K.
- Venue
- British Journal of Cancer
- Published
- 1989-04
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 650-653
- ISSN
- 0007-0920 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-1827
- OpenAlex
- W2069885515
- Cited by
- 255
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Response of patients in phase II studies of chemotherapy in ovarian cancer: implications for patient treatment and the design of phase II trials. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/bjc.1989.132
- The paper
- Blackledge, G., Lawton, F., Redman, C., & Kelly, K. (1989). Response of patients in phase II studies of chemotherapy in ovarian cancer: implications for patient treatment and the design of phase II trials. British Journal of Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1989.132
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.