The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Computer-based interaction analysis of the cancer consultation
Open accessAbstract
There are few data available on which to base recommendations for effective communication in the cancer consultation. This paper describes a computerised interaction analysis system designed specifically for the cancer consultation and its application in a study investigating the relationship between doctor-patient behaviour and patient outcomes. One hundred and forty-two cancer patients attending their first consultation with a cancer specialist were audio taped and a copy of the tape was retained for interaction analysis. Before the consultation patient anxiety and information and involvement preferences were measured. Outcomes included recall of information, patient satisfaction with the consultation and psychological adjustment to cancer. Doctor behaviour was shown to vary significantly according to the age, sex, involvement preferences and in/out-patient status of the patient. The ratio of doctor to patient talk was related to satisfaction with communication, while patients whose questions were answered showed better psychological adjustment at follow-up. The results suggest that patient-centred consultations lead to improved satisfaction and psychological adjustment. These data provide precise information about consultation behaviour which can be used in the documentation of current practice and the evaluation of new interventions to improve communication.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Depression and quality of life in older persons: A review
Sivertsen, H., Bjørkløf, G. H., Engedal, K., Selbæk, G., & Helvik, A.-S. (2015) · Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders · doi:10.1159/000437299 · Cited by 14,152
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
Zigmond, A. S., & Snaith, R. P. (2013) · PsycTESTS Dataset · doi:10.1037/t03589-000 · Cited by 946
The hospital anxiety and depression scale
Snaith, R. P., & Zigmond, A. S. (1986) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.292.6516.344 · Cited by 879
Cited by
Cancer patients' information needs and information seeking behaviour: in depth interview study
Leydon, G. M. (2000) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.320.7239.909 · Cited by 836
Interacting with cancer patients: the significance of physicians' communication behavior
Arora, N. K. (2003) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(02)00449-5 · Cited by 661
Oncologist Communication About Emotion During Visits With Patients With Advanced Cancer
Pollak, K. I., Arnold, R. M., Jeffreys, A. S., Alexander, S. C., Olsen, M. K., Abernethy, A. P., Sugg Skinner, C., Rodriguez, K. L., & Tulsky, J. A. (2007) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2007.12.4180 · Cited by 406
The communication goals and needs of cancer patients: a review
Hack, T. F., Degner, L. F., & Parker, P. A. (2005) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.949 · Cited by 398
Communication breakdown in the outpatient referral process
Gandhi, T. K., Sittig, D. F., Franklin, M., Sussman, A. J., Fairchild, D. G., & Bates, D. W. (2000) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.91119.x · Cited by 371
Metadata
- Authors
- Butow, P., Dunn, S., Tattersall, M., & Jones, Q.
- Venue
- British Journal of Cancer
- Published
- 1995-05
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1115-1121
- ISSN
- 0007-0920 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-1827
- OpenAlex
- W2011152558
- Cited by
- 162
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 8.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Computer-based interaction analysis of the cancer consultation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/bjc.1995.216
- The paper
- Butow, P., Dunn, S., Tattersall, M., & Jones, Q. (1995). Computer-based interaction analysis of the cancer consultation. British Journal of Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1995.216
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.