Plerixafor (Mozobil) for stem cell mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma previously treated with lenalidomide
Abstract
Lenalidomide and other new agents have considerable activity in multiple myeloma (MM) and have changed the landscape of treatment. Data suggest that lenalidomide therapy before autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation has a detrimental effect on stem cell mobilization. This retrospective study examined the efficacy of plerixafor in combination with G-CSF among patients with MM previously treated with lenalidomide (median, 4 cycles; range, 1-20 cycles). Data were analyzed for 60 patients who received plerixafor plus G-CSF for frontline mobilization in a phase 3 clinical trial or an expanded access program (n=20) or for remobilization in a compassionate use program (n=40). The overall median number of CD34+ cells collected was 5.6 × 10(6) per kg (range, 0.45 × 10(6)-37.2 × 10(6)). The minimum number of CD34+ cells (2 × 10(6) per kg) was collected from 86.7% of patients in a median of 1 day. This minimum was collected from 100% of patients who underwent frontline mobilization and 80% of patients who underwent remobilization. These data suggest that CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells can be successfully and predictably collected with combination plerixafor plus G-CSF for primary or secondary mobilization in the majority of patients with MM who have been previously treated with lenalidomide.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Solid tumours associated with lenalidomide use are most commonly non-melanoma skin cancers, which can usually be managed conservatively.
“Solid tumours associated with lenalidomide use are most commonly non-melanoma skin cancers, which can usually be managed conservatively127.”
From Cancer therapies based on targeted protein degradation — lessons learned with lenalidomide (2021) · cites this paper as [127]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 34 · Cited by 61
- Authors
- Micallef, I. N. M., Ho, A. D., Klein, L. M., Marulkar, S., Gandhi, P. J., & McSweeney, P. A.
- Affiliations
- Mayo Clinic (US)
- Heidelberg University (DE)
- Advocate Lutheran General Hospital (US)
- Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers (US)
- Corresponding author
- Micallef, I N M
- Venue
- Bone Marrow Transplantation
- Published
- 2010-05-17
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 350-355
- ISSN
- 0268-3369 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-5365
- OpenAlex
- W2009443185
- Cited by
- 61
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 6.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- erratum (2011-10-12)
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Bone Marrow Transplantation (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Mesenchymal stem cell research
- Keywords
- plerixafor, lenalidomide, multiple myeloma, hematopoietic stem cell mobilization, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, autologous stem cell transplantation, CD34+ cell collection, remobilization
- MeSH terms
- Lenalidomide, Cyclams, Antineoplastic Agents, Benzylamines, Blood Component Removal, Female, Hematopoietic Stem Cells, Heterocyclic Compounds, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Multiple Myeloma, Retrospective Studies, Thalidomide, Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor, Antigens, CD34, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review