Nurturing brain plasticity: Impact of environmental enrichment
Abstract
Environmental enrichment (EE) is known to profoundly affect the central nervous system (CNS) at the functional, anatomical and molecular level, both during the critical period and during adulthood. Recent studies focusing on the visual system have shown that these effects are associated with the recruitment of previously unsuspected neural plasticity processes. At early stages of brain development, EE triggers a marked acceleration in the maturation of the visual system, with maternal behaviour acting as a fundamental mediator of the enriched experience in both the foetus and the newborn. In adult brain, EE enhances plasticity in the cerebral cortex, allowing the recovery of visual functions in amblyopic animals. The molecular substrate of the effects of EE on brain plasticity is multi-factorial, with reduced intracerebral inhibition, enhanced neurotrophin expression and epigenetic changes at the level of chromatin structure. These findings shed new light on the potential of EE as a non-invasive strategy to ameliorate deficits in the development of the CNS and to treat neurological disorders.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Environmental enrichment in animal models of mental and neurodegenerative disorders has been linked to morphological changes such as dendritic and synaptic growth and neurogenesis in the hippocampus as well as molecular alterations including neurotransmitter levels, neurotransmitter receptor expression and neurotrophin expression.
“environmental enrichment in animal models of mental and neurodegenerative disorders has been linked to morphological changes such as dendritic and synaptic growth and neurogenesis in the hippocampus as well as molecular alterations including neurotransmitter levels, neurotransmitter receptor expression and neurotrophin expression (for review, see Alwis & Rajan, 2014;Baroncelli et al., 2010).”
From The applied implications of epigenetics in anxiety, affective and stress-related disorders - A review and synthesis on psychosocial stress, psychotherapy and prevention (2020) · cites this paper as Baroncelli et al., 2010
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 205 · Cited by 330
- Authors
- Baroncelli, L., Braschi, C., Spolidoro, M., Begenisic, T., Sale, A., & Maffei, L.
- Affiliations
- Scuola Normale Superiore (IT)
- University of Florence (IT)
- Neuroscience Institute (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Baroncelli, L
- ORCID
- Venue
- Cell Death & Differentiation
- Published
- 2009-12-18
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1092-1103
- ISSN
- 1350-9047 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-5403
- OpenAlex
- W2027887897
- Cited by
- 330
- References
- 205
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 20
- FWCI
- 1.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Cell Death and Differentiation (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Keywords
- environmental enrichment, neuroplasticity, visual system development, maternal behavior, amblyopia, neurotrophins, critical period
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Brain, Central Nervous System, Cerebral Cortex, Environment, Humans, Neuronal Plasticity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review