Cited by 299Cell death mechanisms and regulationNF-κB Signaling PathwaysFerroptosis and cancer prognosis

Distinct roles of RIP1–RIP3 hetero- and RIP3–RIP3 homo-interaction in mediating necroptosis

Open access
Wu, X-N, Yang, Z-H, Wang, X-K, Zhang, Y, Wan, H, Song, Y, Chen, X, Shao, J +1 more·2014·Cell Death & Differentiation

Abstract

Necroptosis is mediated by a signaling complex called necrosome, containing receptor-interacting protein (RIP)1, RIP3, and mixed-lineage kinase domain-like (MLKL). It is known that RIP1 and RIP3 form heterodimeric filamentous scaffold in necrosomes through their RIP homotypic interaction motif (RHIM) domain-mediated oligomerization, but the signaling events based on this scaffold has not been fully addressed. By using inducible dimer systems we found that RIP1-RIP1 interaction is dispensable for necroptosis; RIP1-RIP3 interaction is required for necroptosis signaling, but there is no necroptosis if no additional RIP3 protein is recruited to the RIP1-RIP3 heterodimer, and the interaction with RIP1 promotes the RIP3 to recruit other RIP3; RIP3-RIP3 interaction is required for necroptosis and RIP3-RIP3 dimerization is sufficient to induce necroptosis; and RIP3 dimer-induced necroptosis requires MLKL. We further show that RIP3 oligomer is not more potent than RIP3 dimer in triggering necroptosis, suggesting that RIP3 homo-interaction in the complex, rather than whether RIP3 has formed homo polymer, is important for necroptosis. RIP3 dimerization leads to RIP3 intramolecule autophosphorylation, which is required for the recruitment of MLKL. Interestingly, phosphorylation of one of RIP3 in the dimer is sufficient to induce necroptosis. As RIP1-RIP3 heterodimer itself cannot induce necroptosis, the RIP1-RIP3 heterodimeric amyloid fibril is unlikely to directly propagate necroptosis. We propose that the signaling events after the RIP1-RIP3 amyloid complex assembly are the recruitment of free RIP3 by the RIP3 in the amyloid scaffold followed by autophosphorylation of RIP3 and subsequent recruitment of MLKL by RIP3 to execute necroptosis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/cdd.2014.77

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Activation of RIPK3 downstream of TNFR1 ligation relies on formation of RIPK1-containing and RIPK3-containing amyloid-like signaling complex known as necrosome, wherein first RIPK1 and then RIPK3 undergo trans-phosphorylation or auto-phosphorylation events required for MLKL recruitment and necroptosis activation.

    “In particular, the activation of RIPK3 downstream of TNFR1 ligation relies on the formation of a RIPK1-containing and RIPK3-containing amyloid-like signaling complex commonly known as necrosome [436, 470], wherein first RIPK1 and then RIPK3 undergo a series of trans-phosphorylation or auto-phosphorylation events that are required for MLKL recruitment and necroptosis activation [437, 438, 442, 471]”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 56 · Cited by 299

Research works printed but not linked: 44

  1. Vanden Berghe T, Vanlangenakker N, Parthoens E, Deckers W, Devos M, Festjens N et al. Necroptosis, necrosis and secondary necrosis converge on similar cellular disintegration features. Cell Death Differ 2010; 17: 922-930.
  2. Han J, Zhong CQ, Zhang DW. Programmed necrosis: backup to and competitor with apoptosis in the immune system. Nat Immunol 2011; 12: 1143-1149.
  3. Holler N, Zaru R, Micheau O, Thome M, Attinger A, Valitutti S et al. Fas triggers an alternative, caspase-8-independent cell death pathway using the kinase RIP as effector molecule. Nat Immunol 2000; 1: 489-495.
  4. Zhang DW, Shao J, Lin J, Zhang N, Lu BJ, Lin SC et al. RIP3, an energy metabolism regulator that switches TNF-induced cell death from apoptosis to necrosis. Science 2009; 325: 332-336.
  5. Cho YS, Challa S, Moquin D, Genga R, Ray TD, Guildford M et al. Phosphorylation-driven assembly of the RIP1-RIP3 complex regulates programmed necrosis and virus-induced inflammation. Cell 2009; 137: 1112-1123.
  6. Rebsamen M, Heinz LX, Meylan E, Michallet MC, Schroder K, Hofmann K et al. DAI/ZBP1 recruits RIP1 and RIP3 through RIP homotypic interaction motifs to activate NF-kappaB. EMBO Rep 2009; 10: 916-922.
  7. Robinson N, McComb S, Mulligan R, Dudani R, Krishnan L, Sad S. Type I interferon induces necroptosis in macrophages during infection with Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. Nat Immunol 2012; 13: 954-962.
  8. Sahaboglu A, Paquet-Durand O, Dietter J, Dengler K, Bernhard-Kurz S, Ekstrom PA et al. Retinitis pigmentosa: rapid neurodegeneration is governed by slow cell death mechanisms. Cell Death Dis 2013; 4: e488.
  9. Upton JW, Kaiser WJ, Mocarski ES. Virus inhibition of RIP3-dependent necrosis. Cell Host Microbe 2010; 7: 302-313.
  10. Duprez L, Takahashi N, Van Hauwermeiren F, Vandendriessche B, Goossens V, Vanden Berghe T et al. RIP kinase-dependent necrosis drives lethal systemic inflammatory response syndrome. Immunity 2011; 35: 908-918.
  11. Gunther C, Martini E, Wittkopf N, Amann K, Weigmann B, Neumann H et al. Caspase-8 regulates TNF-alpha-induced epithelial necroptosis and terminal ileitis. Nature 2011; 477: 335-339.
  12. Lukens JR, Vogel P, Johnson GR, Kelliher MA, Iwakura Y, Lamkanfi M et al. RIP1-driven autoinflammation targets IL-1alpha independently of inflammasomes and RIP3. Nature 2013; 498: 224-227.
  13. Lin J, Li H, Yang M, Ren J, Huang Z, Han F et al. A role of RIP3-mediated macrophage necrosis in atherosclerosis development. Cell Rep 2013; 3: 200-210.
  14. Linkermann A, Brasen JH, Himmerkus N, Liu S, Huber TB, Kunzendorf U et al. Rip1 (receptor-interacting protein kinase 1) mediates necroptosis and contributes to renal ischemia/reperfusion injury. Kidney Int 2012; 81: 751-761.
  15. Zhang H, Zhou X, McQuade T, Li J, Chan FK, Zhang J. Functional complementation between FADD and RIP1 in embryos and lymphocytes. Nature 2011; 471: 373-376.
  16. Galluzzi L, Kepp O, Kroemer G. FADD: an endogenous inhibitor of RIP3-driven regulated necrosis. Cell Res 2011; 21: 1383-1385.
  17. Zhang DW, Zheng M, Zhao J, Li YY, Huang Z, Li Z et al. Multiple death pathways in TNF- treated fibroblasts: RIP3-and RIP1-dependent and independent routes. Cell Res 2011; 21: 368-371.
  18. Moriwaki K, Chan FK. RIP3: a molecular switch for necrosis and inflammation. Genes Dev 2013; 27: 1640-1649.
  19. Moujalled DM, Cook WD, Okamoto T, Murphy J, Lawlor KE, Vince JE et al. TNF can activate RIPK3 and cause programmed necrosis in the absence of RIPK1. Cell Death Dis 2013; 4: e465.
  20. Thapa RJ, Nogusa S, Chen P, Maki JL, Lerro A, Andrake M et al. Interferon-induced RIP1/ RIP3-mediated necrosis requires PKR and is licensed by FADD and caspases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2013; 110: E3109-E3118.
  21. Chan FK, Baehrecke EH. RIP3 finds partners in crime. Cell 2012; 148: 17-18.
  22. Wrighton KH. Cell death: A killer puts a stop on necroptosis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2011; 12: 279.
  23. Wu YT, Tan HL, Huang Q, Sun XJ, Zhu X, Shen HM. zVAD-induced necroptosis in L929 cells depends on autocrine production of TNFalpha mediated by the PKC-MAPKs-AP-1 pathway. Cell Death Differ 2011; 18: 26-37.
  24. Kim SJ, Li J. Caspase blockade induces RIP3-mediated programmed necrosis in Toll-like receptor-activated microglia. Cell Death Dis 2013; 4: e716.
  25. Kang TB, Yang SH, Toth B, Kovalenko A, Wallach D. Caspase-8 blocks kinase RIPK3-mediated activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome. Immunity 2013; 38: 27-40.
  26. Vanlangenakker N, Vanden Berghe T, Bogaert P, Laukens B, Zobel K, Deshayes K et al. cIAP1 and TAK1 protect cells from TNF-induced necrosis by preventing RIP1/RIP3- dependent reactive oxygen species production. Cell Death Differ 2011; 18: 656-665.
  27. Xie T, Peng W, Yan C, Wu J, Gong X, Shi Y. Structural insights into RIP3-mediated necroptotic signaling. Cell Rep 2013; 5: 70-78.
  28. Murphy JM, Czabotar PE, Hildebrand JM, Lucet IS, Zhang JG, Alvarez-Diaz S et al. The pseudokinase MLKL mediates necroptosis via a molecular switch mechanism. Immunity 2013; 39: 443-453.
  29. Sun L, Wang H, Wang Z, He S, Chen S, Liao D et al. Mixed lineage kinase domain-like protein mediates necrosis signaling downstream of RIP3 kinase. Cell 2012; 148: 213-227.
  30. Zhao J, Jitkaew S, Cai Z, Choksi S, Li Q, Luo J et al. Mixed lineage kinase domain-like is a key receptor interacting protein 3 downstream component of TNF-induced necrosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012; 109: 5322-5327.
  31. Wu X, Tian L, Li J, Zhang Y, Han V, Li Y et al. Investigation of RIP3-dependent protein phosphorylation by quantitative phosphoproteomics. Mol Cell Proteomics 2012; 11: 1640-1651.
  32. Kaiser WJ, Sridharan H, Huang C, Mandal P, Upton JW, Gough PJ et al. Toll-like Receptor 3-mediated Necrosis via TRIF, RIP3, and MLKL. J Biol Chem 2013; 288: 31268-31279.
  33. Murphy JM, Lucet IS, Hildebrand JM, Tanzer MC, Young SN, Sharma P et al. Insights into the evolution of divergent nucleotide-binding mechanisms among pseudokinases revealed by crystal structures of human and mouse MLKL. Biochem J 2013; 457: 369-377.
  34. Zhou Z, Han V, Han J. New components of the necroptotic pathway. Protein Cell 2012; 3: 811-817.
  35. Feoktistova M, Geserick P, Kellert B, Dimitrova DP, Langlais C, Hupe M et al. cIAPs block Ripoptosome formation, a RIP1/caspase-8 containing intracellular cell death complex differentially regulated by cFLIP isoforms. Mol Cell 2011; 43: 449-463.
  36. Tenev T, Bianchi K, Darding M, Broemer M, Langlais C, Wallberg F et al. The Ripoptosome, a signaling platform that assembles in response to genotoxic stress and loss of IAPs. Mol Cell 2011; 43: 432-448.
  37. Sun X, Yin J, Starovasnik MA, Fairbrother WJ, Dixit VM. Identification of a novel homotypic interaction motif required for the phosphorylation of receptor-interacting protein (RIP) by RIP3. J Biol Chem 2002; 277: 9505-9511.
  38. Li J, McQuade T, Siemer AB, Napetschnig J, Moriwaki K, Hsiao YS et al. The RIP1/RIP3 necrosome forms a functional amyloid signaling complex required for programmed necrosis. Cell 2012; 150: 339-350.
  39. Degterev A, Hitomi J, Germscheid M, Ch'en IL, Korkina O, Teng X et al. Identification of RIP1 kinase as a specific cellular target of necrostatins. Nat Chem Biol 2008; 4: 313-321.
  40. Jain A, Liu R, Ramani B, Arauz E, Ishitsuka Y, Ragunathan K et al. Probing cellular protein complexes using single-molecule pull-down. Nature 2011; 473: 484-488.
  41. Pollock R, Giel M, Linher K, Clackson T. Regulation of endogenous gene expression with a small-molecule dimerizer. Nat Biotechnol 2002; 20: 729-733.
  42. Chen W, Zhou Z, Li L, Zhong CQ, Zheng X, Wu X et al. Diverse sequence determinants control human and mouse receptor interacting protein 3 (RIP3) and mixed lineage kinase domain-like (MLKL) interaction in necroptotic signaling. J Biol Chem 2013; 288: 16247-16261.
  43. Littlewood TD, Hancock DC, Danielian PS, Parker MG, Evan GI. A modified oestrogen receptor ligand-binding domain as an improved switch for the regulation of heterologous proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 1995; 23: 1686-1690.
  44. Orozco S, Yatim N, Werner MR, Tran H, Gunja SY, Tait SWG et al. RIPK1 both positively and negatively regulates RIPK3 oligomerization and necroptosis. Cell Death Differ 2014; e-pub ahead of print 6 June 2014; doi:10.1038/cdd.2014.76. · DOI · Paper page

Authors
Wu, X.-N., Yang, Z.-H., Wang, X.-K., Zhang, Y., Wan, H., Song, Y., Chen, X., Shao, J., & Han, J.
Affiliations
Xiamen University (CN)
Corresponding author
Han, J
Venue
Cell Death & Differentiation
Published
2014-06-06
Volume
21
Issue
11
Pages
1709-1720
ISSN
  • 1350-9047 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5403
OpenAlex
W2057880516
Cited by
299
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 9
FWCI
11.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell Death and Differentiation (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Ariad Pharmaceuticals
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (111 Project, 973 Program, 2014CB541804, 31221065, 31330047, 91029304, B12001)
  • Xiamen University
  • Higher Education Discipline Innovation Project (B12001)
  • National High-tech Research and Development Program (2012AA02A201)
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (2014CB541804, 31221065, 2013CB944903, 91029304)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Cell death mechanisms and regulation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › NF-κB Signaling Pathways
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Ferroptosis and cancer prognosis
Keywords
necroptosis, RIPK1, RIPK3, MLKL, necrosome, amyloid fibrils, signaling complex assembly
MeSH terms
Animals, Humans, Necrosis, Phosphorylation, Protein Kinases, Apoptosis, Receptor-Interacting Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases, Protein Multimerization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review