Cited by 145Autophagy in Disease and TherapyCancer Cells and MetastasisOvarian cancer diagnosis and treatment

Autophagy inhibition reduces chemoresistance and tumorigenic potential of human ovarian cancer stem cells

Open access
Pagotto, Anna, Pilotto, Giorgia, Mazzoldi, Elena Laura, Nicoletto, Maria Ornella, Frezzini, Simona, Pastò, Anna, Amadori, Alberto·2017·Cell Death & Disease

Abstract

Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is one of the most malignant gynecological tumors with a high mortality rate owing to tumor relapse after anticancer therapies. It is widely accepted that a rare tumor cell population, known as cancer stem cells (CSC), is responsible for tumor progression and relapse; intriguingly, these cells are able to survive nutrient starvation (such as in vitro culture in the absence of glucose) and chemotherapy treatment. Recent data also indicated that chemotherapy resistance is associated with autophagy activation. We thus decided to investigate both in vitro and in vivo the autophagic activity and the effects of the perturbation of this pathway in CSC isolated from EOC ascitic effusions. Ovarian CSC, identified according to their CD44/CD117 co-expression, presented a higher basal autophagy compared with the non-stem counterpart. Inhibition of this pathway, by in vitro chloroquine treatment or CRISPR/Cas9 ATG5 knockout, impaired canonical CSC properties, such as viability, the ability to form spheroidal structures in vitro, and in vivo tumorigenic potential. In addition, autophagy inhibition showed a synergistic effect with carboplatin administration on both in vitro CSC properties and in vivo tumorigenic activity. On the whole, these results indicate that the autophagy process has a key role in CSC maintenance; inhibition of this pathway in combination with other chemotherapeutic approaches could represent a novel effective strategy to overcome drug resistance and tumor recurrence.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/cddis.2017.327

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Proficient autophagic responses most often mediate cytoprotective rather than cytotoxic effects in adaptation to stress.

    “Proficient autophagic responses (which are under tight transcriptional and post-translational regulation) [509 799–805] most often operate at the hub of adaptation to stress, hence mediating cytoprotective (rather than cytotoxic) effects [806–811].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 41 · Cited by 145

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Bjorkoy G, Lamark T, Pankiv S, Overvatn A, Brech A, Johansen T. Monitoring autophagic degradation of p62/SQSTM1. Methods Enzymol 2009; 452: 181-197.

Authors
Pagotto, A., Pilotto, G., Mazzoldi, E. L., Nicoletto, M. O., Frezzini, S., Pastò, A., & Amadori, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Padua (IT)
  • Istituto Oncologico Veneto (IT)
Corresponding author
Pastò, Anna
Venue
Cell Death & Disease
Published
2017-07-20
Volume
8
Issue
7
Pages
e2943-e2943
ISSN
2041-4889 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2737712434
Cited by
145
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 2
FWCI
11.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell Death and Disease (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System (Università degli Studi di Brescia) (submittedVersion)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • European Commission (2007–2013, FP7 2007-2013, FP7/2007, 600376)
  • Università degli Studi di Padova (600376)
  • Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Autophagy in Disease and Therapy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Cells and Metastasis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
Keywords
autophagy inhibition, ovarian cancer stem cells, epithelial ovarian cancer, chemoresistance, tumorigenicity, chloroquine, CRISPR/Cas9, carboplatin, spheroid formation, tumor recurrence
MeSH terms
Autophagy-Related Protein 5, Adult, Autophagy, Female, Humans, Neoplasm Proteins, Ovarian Neoplasms, Neoplastic Stem Cells, Drug Resistance, Neoplasm, Gene Knockdown Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review