The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Time to stop counting the tablets?
Abstract
We attempted to assess compliance using both a pharmacologic indicator (low-dose phenobarbital) and a return tablet count in 225 patients who were taking part in three separate studies. There were 216 patients (96%) who kept a follow-up appointment after 28 days; 161 patients appeared to have good compliance (90% to 109%) by return tablet count. Of these 161 patients, 51 (32%) had plasma phenobarbital concentrations (corrected for dose and weight) that were less than 90% of the lowest value previously found in normal volunteers, which suggested poorer compliance. When compared with the age-related volunteer values, 77 (48%) had values that were less than 90% of the lowest volunteer value. There were 6 of 10 patients with apparently excessive (greater than or equal to 110%) compliance by return tablet count and 4 of 12 who failed to return their container who also had phenobarbital concentrations that were less than 90% of the lowest volunteer value. We concluded that return tablet count grossly overestimates compliance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Osterberg, L., & Blaschke, T. (2005) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra050100 · Cited by 7,974
Patient Medication Adherence: Measures in Daily Practice
Jimmy, B., & Jose, J. (2011) · Oman Medical Journal · doi:10.5001/omj.2011.38 · Cited by 956
Farmer, K. C. (1999) · Clinical Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/s0149-2918(99)80026-5 · Cited by 889
Patient adherence and persistence with oral anticancer treatment
Ruddy, K., Mayer, E., & Partridge, A. (2009) · CA A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.20004 · Cited by 569
Measurement, Correlates, and Health Outcomes of Medication Adherence Among Seniors
Vik, S. A., Maxwell, C. J., & Hogan, D. B. (2004) · Annals of Pharmacotherapy · doi:10.1345/aph.1d252 · Cited by 403
Metadata
- Authors
- Pullar, T., Kumar, S., Tindall, H., & Feely, M.
- Venue
- Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1989-08
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 163-168
- ISSN
- 0009-9236 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-6535
- OpenAlex
- W2008454003
- Cited by
- 237
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Time to stop counting the tablets? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/clpt.1989.121
- The paper
- Pullar, T., Kumar, S., Tindall, H., & Feely, M. (1989). Time to stop counting the tablets? Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics. https://doi.org/10.1038/clpt.1989.121
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.