The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Drug–Drug Interactions Mediated Through P-Glycoprotein: Clinical Relevance and In Vitro–In Vivo Correlation Using Digoxin as a Probe Drug
Abstract
The clinical pharmacokinetics and in vitro inhibition of digoxin were examined to predict the P-glycoprotein (P-gp) component of drug–drug interactions. Coadministered drugs (co-meds) in clinical trials (N = 123) resulted in a small, ≤100% increase in digoxin pharmacokinetics. Digoxin is likely to show the highest perturbation, via inhibition of P-gp, because of the absence of metabolic clearance. In vitro inhibitory potency data (concentration of inhibitor to inhibit 50% P-gp activity; IC50) were generated using Caco-2 cells for 19 P-gp inhibitors. Maximum steady-state inhibitor systemic concentration [I], [I]/IC50 ratios, hypothetical gut concentration ([I2], dose/250 ml), and [I2]/IC50 ratios were calculated to simulate systemic and gut-based interactions and were compared with peak plasma concentration (Cmax),i,ss/Cmax, ss and area under the curve (AUC)i/AUC ratios from the clinical trials. [I]/IC50 < 0.1 shows high false-negative rates (24% AUC, 41% Cmax); however, to a limited extent, [I2]/IC50 < 10 is predictive of negative digoxin interaction for AUC, and [I]/IC50 > 0.1 is predictive of clinical digoxin interactions (AUC and Cmax). Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (2009); 85, 2, 173–181 doi:10.1038/clpt.2008.195
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Membrane transporters in drug development
The International Transporter Consortium, Giacomini, K. M., Huang, S.-M., Tweedie, D. J., Benet, L. Z., Brouwer, K. L. R., Chu, X., Dahlin, A., Evers, R., Fischer, V., et al. (2010) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd3028 · Cited by 3,340
Self-citationHanke, N., Frechen, S., Moj, D., Britz, H., Eissing, T., Wendl, T., & Lehr, T. (2018) · CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology · doi:10.1002/psp4.12343 · Cited by 169
Sjögren, E., Westergren, J., Grant, I., Hanisch, G., Lindfors, L., Lennernäs, H., Abrahamsson, B., & Tannergren, C. (2013) · European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ejps.2013.05.019 · Cited by 168
Drug interactions evaluation: An integrated part of risk assessment of therapeutics
Zhang, L., Reynolds, K. S., Zhao, P., & Huang, S.-M. (2010) · Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.taap.2009.12.016 · Cited by 125
Hu, T., To, K. K. W., Wang, L., Zhang, L., Lu, L., Shen, J., Chan, R. L. Y., Li, M., Yeung, J. H. K., & Cho, C. H. (2014) · Phytomedicine · doi:10.1016/j.phymed.2014.06.013 · Cited by 99
Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of lenalidomide
Chen, N., Zhou, S., & Palmisano, M. (2017) · Clinical Pharmacokinetics · doi:10.1007/s40262-016-0432-1 · Cited by 86
Metadata
- Authors
- Fenner, K., Troutman, M., Kempshall, S., Cook, J., Ware, J., Smith, D., & Lee, C.
- Venue
- Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-11-05
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 173-181
- ISSN
- 0009-9236 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-6535
- OpenAlex
- W2172147566
- Cited by
- 272
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.