The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Activity Levels of Tamoxifen Metabolites at the Estrogen Receptor and the Impact of Genetic Polymorphisms of Phase I and II Enzymes on Their Concentration Levels in Plasma
Abstract
The therapeutic effect of tamoxifen depends on active metabolites, e.g., cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6) mediated formation of endoxifen. To test for additional relationships, 236 breast cancer patients were genotyped for CYP2D6, CYP2C9, CYP2B6, CYP2C19, CYP3A5, UGT1A4, UGT2B7, and UGT2B15; also, plasma concentrations of tamoxifen and 22 of its metabolites, including the (E)-, (Z)-, 3-, and 4'-hydroxymetabolites as well as their glucuronides, were quantified using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (MS). The activity levels of the metabolites were measured using an estrogen response element reporter assay; the strongest estrogen receptor inhibition was found for (Z)-endoxifen and (Z)-4-hydroxytamoxifen (inhibitory concentration 50 (IC50) 3 and 7 nmol/l, respectively). CYP2D6 genotypes explained 39 and 9% of the variability of steady-state concentrations of (Z)-endoxifen and (Z)-4-hydroxytamoxifen, respectively. Among the poor metabolizers, 93% had (Z)-endoxifen levels below IC90 values, underscoring the role of CYP2D6 deficiency in compromised tamoxifen bioactivation. For other enzymes tested, carriers of reduced-function CYP2C9 (*2, *3) alleles had lower plasma concentrations of active metabolites (P < 0.004), pointing to the role of additional pathways.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Zanger, U. M., & Schwab, M. (2013) · Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.pharmthera.2012.12.007 · Cited by 4,169
Self-citationGoetz, M. P., Sangkuhl, K., Guchelaar, H., Schwab, M., Province, M., Whirl‐Carrillo, M., Symmans, W. F., McLeod, H. L., Ratain, M. J., Zembutsu, H., et al. (2018) · Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1002/cpt.1007 · Cited by 336
Self-citationReview of therapeutic drug monitoring of anticancer drugs part two – Targeted therapies
Widmer, N., Bardin, C., Chatelut, E., Paci, A., Beijnen, J., Levêque, D., Veal, G., & Astier, A. (2014) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2014.04.015 · Cited by 296
Jager, N. G. L., Rosing, H., Linn, S. C., Schellens, J. H. M., & Beijnen, J. H. (2015) · Therapeutic Drug Monitoring · doi:10.1097/ftd.0000000000000224 · Cited by 14
Keller, D. N., Medwid, S. J., Ross, C. D., Wigle, T. J., & Kim, R. B. (2023) · Pharmacogenetics and Genomics · doi:10.1097/fpc.0000000000000486 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Mürdter, T. E., Schroth, W., Bacchus-Gerybadze, L., Winter, S., Heinkele, G., Simon, W., Fasching, P. A., Fehm, T., Eichelbaum, M., Schwab, M., & Brauch, H.
- Venue
- Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-03-30
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 708-717
- ISSN
- 0009-9236 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-6535
- OpenAlex
- W2104708747
- Cited by
- 270
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 27.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Activity Levels of Tamoxifen Metabolites at the Estrogen Receptor and the Impact of Genetic Polymorphisms of Phase I and II Enzymes on Their Concentration Levels in Plasma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/clpt.2011.27
- The paper
- Mürdter, T. E., Schroth, W., Bacchus-Gerybadze, L., Winter, S., Heinkele, G., Simon, W., Fasching, P. A., Fehm, T., Eichelbaum, M., Schwab, M., & Brauch, H. (2011). Activity Levels of Tamoxifen Metabolites at the Estrogen Receptor and the Impact of Genetic Polymorphisms of Phase I and II Enzymes on Their Concentration Levels in Plasma. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics. https://doi.org/10.1038/clpt.2011.27
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.