Cited by 198Pharmacogenetics and Drug MetabolismDrug Transport and Resistance MechanismsProtein Interaction Studies and Fluorescence Analysis

Understanding the Critical Disposition Pathways of Statins to Assess Drug–Drug Interaction Risk During Drug Development: It's Not Just About OATP1B1

Elsby, R, Hilgendorf, C, Fenner, K·2012·Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Abstract

The use of statins is widespread across disease areas because many patients have comorbidities. Given that these drugs have become common as comedications, it is essential to have an understanding of the potential risks of drug-drug interactions (DDIs) between statins and candidate drugs in development. Although the hepatic uptake transporter organic anion-transporting polypeptide 1B1 (OATP1B1) is known to play a substantial role in statin-related DDI risk, other transporters and metabolizing enzymes can also be involved. Consequently, a holistic approach to risk assessment is required, tailored to each statin. Using evidence from pharmacogenetics, DDIs, and literature on absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination (ADME) in humans, this review identifies pathways that contribute the most to, and are therefore the most critical to, the disposition of each statin. It also provides an understanding of the expected theoretical maximum increase in systemic exposure if the disposition of a statin is inhibited. Finally, on a statin-by-statin basis, we propose in vitro inhibition studies that should be routinely conducted during drug development so as to better assess DDI risk.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/clpt.2012.163

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Elsby, R., Hilgendorf, C., & Fenner, K.
Affiliations
  • AstraZeneca (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • AstraZeneca (Sweden) (SE)
Corresponding author
Elsby, R
Venue
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-10-10
Volume
92
Issue
5
Pages
584-598
ISSN
  • 0009-9236 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-6535
OpenAlex
W2110287784
Cited by
198
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Interaction Studies and Fluorescence Analysis
Keywords
statins, drug-drug interactions, OATP1B1, drug disposition, hepatic uptake transporters, drug-metabolizing enzymes, pharmacogenetics, systemic exposure
MeSH terms
Animals, Biological Transport, Drug Interactions, Humans, Liver, Tissue Distribution, Drug Design, Risk Assessment, Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors, Organic Anion Transporters, Liver-Specific Organic Anion Transporter 1

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review