Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 192

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Optimizing Drug Outcomes Through Pharmacogenetics: A Case for Preemptive Genotyping

Open access
Schildcrout, J S, Denny, J C, Bowton, E, Gregg, W, Pulley, J M, Basford, M A, Cowan, J D, Xu, H, Ramirez, A H, Crawford, D C, Ritchie, M D, Peterson, J F, Masys, D R, Wilke, R A, Roden, D M·2012·Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Abstract

Routine integration of genotype data into drug decision making could improve patient safety, particularly if many relevant genetic variants can be assayed simultaneously before prescribing the target drug. The frequency of opportunities for pharmacogenetic prescribing and the potential adverse events (AEs) mitigated are unknown. We examined the frequency with which 56 medications with known outcomes influenced by variant alleles were prescribed in a cohort of 52,942 medical home patients at Vanderbilt University Medical Center (VUMC). Within a 5-year window, we estimated that 64.8% (95% confidence interval (CI): 64.4-65.2%) of individuals were exposed to at least one medication with an established pharmacogenetic association. Using previously published results for six medications with severe, well-characterized, genetically linked AEs, we estimated that 383 events (95% CI, 212-552) could have been prevented with an effective preemptive genotyping program. Our results suggest that multiplexed, preemptive genotyping may represent an efficient alternative approach to current single-use ("reactive") methods and may also improve safety.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/clpt.2012.66

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 192

Metadata

Authors
Schildcrout, J. S., Denny, J. C., Bowton, E., Gregg, W., Pulley, J. M., Basford, M. A., Cowan, J. D., Xu, H., Ramirez, A. H., Crawford, D. C., Ritchie, M. D., Peterson, J. F., Masys, D. R., Wilke, R. A., & Roden, D. M.
Venue
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-06-27
Volume
92
Issue
2
Pages
235-242
ISSN
  • 0009-9236 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-6535
OpenAlex
W2075766206
Cited by
192
References
4
FWCI
18.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Optimizing Drug Outcomes Through Pharmacogenetics: A Case for Preemptive Genotyping. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/clpt.2012.66
The paper
Schildcrout, J. S., Denny, J. C., Bowton, E., Gregg, W., Pulley, J. M., Basford, M. A., Cowan, J. D., Xu, H., Ramirez, A. H., Crawford, D. C., Ritchie, M. D., Peterson, J. F., Masys, D. R., Wilke, R. A., & Roden, D. M. (2012). Optimizing Drug Outcomes Through Pharmacogenetics: A Case for Preemptive Genotyping. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics. https://doi.org/10.1038/clpt.2012.66

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.