Cited by 43Acute Myeloid Leukemia ResearchDNA Repair MechanismsGenetic factors in colorectal cancer

Preferential loss of mismatch repair function in refractory and relapsed acute myeloid leukemia: potential contribution to AML progression

Mao, Guogen, Yuan, Fenghua, Absher, Kimberly, Jennings, C Darrell, Howard, Dianna S, Jordan, Craig T, Gu, Liya·2008·Cell Research

Abstract

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is an aggressive hematological cancer. Despite therapeutic regimens that lead to complete remission, the vast majority of patients undergo relapse. The molecular mechanisms underlying AML development and relapse remain incompletely defined. To explore whether loss of DNA mismatch repair (MMR) function is involved in AML, we screened two key MMR genes, MSH2 and MLH1, for mutations and promoter hypermethylation in leukemia specimens from 53 AML patients and blood from 17 non-cancer controls. We show here that whereas no amino acid alteration or promoter hypermethylation was detected in all control samples, 18 AML patients exhibited either mutations in MMR genes or hypermethylation in the MLH1 promoter. In vitro functional MMR analysis revealed that almost all the mutations analyzed resulted in loss of MMR function. MMR defects were significantly more frequent in patients with refractory or relapsed AML compared with newly diagnosed patients. These observations suggest for the first time that the loss of MMR function is associated with refractory and relapsed AML and may contribute to disease pathogenesis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/cr.2008.14

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 39 · Cited by 43

Authors
Mao, G., Yuan, F., Absher, K., Jennings, C. D., Howard, D. S., Jordan, C. T., & Gu, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Kentucky (US)
  • University of Rochester Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Gu, Liya
Venue
Cell Research
Published
2008-01-29
Volume
18
Issue
2
Pages
281-289
ISSN
  • 1001-0602 (ISSN-L)
  • 1748-7838
OpenAlex
W1977667570
Cited by
43
References
39
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cell Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Kentucky
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Cancer Institute (CA104333, R01CA104333)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
Keywords
acute myeloid leukemia, DNA mismatch repair, MSH2, MLH1, promoter hypermethylation, MMR gene mutations, relapsed leukemia, refractory leukemia, disease progression, epigenetic silencing
MeSH terms
MutL Protein Homolog 1, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Infant, Male, Middle Aged, Mutation, Neoplasm Proteins, Nuclear Proteins, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Recurrence, Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute, DNA Methylation, Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing, MutS Homolog 2 Protein, DNA Mismatch Repair

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review