Cited by 247CRISPR and Genetic EngineeringAnimal Genetics and ReproductionSperm and Testicular Function

Correction of a genetic disease by CRISPR-Cas9-mediated gene editing in mouse spermatogonial stem cells

Open access
Wu, Yuxuan, Zhou, Hai, Fan, Xiaoying, Zhang, Ying, Zhang, Man, Wang, Yinghua, Xie, Zhenfei, Bai, Meizhu +14 more·2015·Cell Research

Abstract

Spermatogonial stem cells (SSCs) can produce numerous male gametes after transplantation into recipient testes, presenting a valuable approach for gene therapy and continuous production of gene-modified animals. However, successful genetic manipulation of SSCs has been limited, partially due to complexity and low efficiency of currently available genetic editing techniques. Here, we show that efficient genetic modifications can be introduced into SSCs using the CRISPR-Cas9 system. We used the CRISPR-Cas9 system to mutate an EGFP transgene or the endogenous Crygc gene in SCCs. The mutated SSCs underwent spermatogenesis after transplantation into the seminiferous tubules of infertile mouse testes. Round spermatids were generated and, after injection into mature oocytes, supported the production of heterozygous offspring displaying the corresponding mutant phenotypes. Furthermore, a disease-causing mutation in Crygc (Crygc(-/-)) that pre-existed in SSCs could be readily repaired by CRISPR-Cas9-induced nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) or homology-directed repair (HDR), resulting in SSC lines carrying the corrected gene with no evidence of off-target modifications as shown by whole-genome sequencing. Fertilization using round spermatids generated from these lines gave rise to offspring with the corrected phenotype at an efficiency of 100%. Our results demonstrate efficient gene editing in mouse SSCs by the CRISPR-Cas9 system, and provide the proof of principle of curing a genetic disease via gene correction in SSCs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/cr.2014.160

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pups generated by preselected SSCs were unexceptionally cataract free.

    “The pups generated by these preselected SSCs were unexceptionally cataract free.”

    From CRISPR-Cas9: a new and promising player in gene therapy (2015) · cites this paper as [31]

  • Wu et al corrected Crygc in mouse spermatogonial stem cells with CRISPR-Cas9 and picked SSC lines carrying the corrected gene without undesired genome perturbations.

    “To gain 100% rescue efficiency, Wu et al 31 corrected the culprit gene Crygc in mouse spermatogonial stem cells (SSCs) with CRISPR-Cas9, and then picked out SSC lines that carried the corrected gene without undesired genome perturbations.”

    From CRISPR-Cas9: a new and promising player in gene therapy (2015) · cites this paper as [31]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 51 · Cited by 247

Authors
Wu, Y., Zhou, H., Fan, X., Zhang, Y., Zhang, M., Wang, Y., Xie, Z., Bai, M., Yin, Q., Liang, D., Tang, W., Liao, J., Zhou, C., Liu, W., Zhu, P., Guo, H., Pan, H., Wu, C., Shi, H., Wu, L., Tang, F., & Li, J.
Affiliations
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • China West Normal University (CN)
  • Peking University (CN)
  • Shanghai Institute of Planned Parenthood Research (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Wu, Ligang
  • Tang, Fuchou
  • Li, Jinsong
Venue
Cell Research
Published
2014-12-05
Volume
25
Issue
1
Pages
67-79
ISSN
  • 1001-0602 (ISSN-L)
  • 1748-7838
OpenAlex
W1999688054
Cited by
247
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (31225017, 31271543, 31322037, 91319310)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDA01010403)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Animal Genetics and Reproduction
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Sperm and Testicular Function
Keywords
spermatogonial stem cells, CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing, gene therapy, gene correction, spermatogenesis, round spermatids, transgenic mice, infertility, non-homologous end joining, homology-directed repair, off-target effects, disease cure
MeSH terms
Animals, Cells, Cultured, Female, Infertility, Male, Male, Mice, Inbred BALB C, Spermatogenesis, Genetic Therapy, Mutagenesis, Genes, erbB-1, Transgenes, gamma-Crystallins, Mice, Adult Stem Cells, DNA End-Joining Repair, CRISPR-Cas Systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review