Fusobacterium nucleatum in colorectal carcinoma tissue according to tumor location
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVES: Evidence suggests a possible role of Fusobacterium nucleatum in colorectal carcinogenesis, especially in right-sided proximal colorectum. Considering a change in bowel contents and microbiome from proximal to distal colorectal segments, we hypothesized that the proportion of colorectal carcinoma enriched with F. nucleatum might gradually increase along the bowel subsites from rectum to cecum. METHODS: A retrospective, cross-sectional analysis was conducted on 1,102 colon and rectal carcinomas in molecular pathological epidemiology databases of the Nurses' Health Study and the Health Professionals Follow-up Study. We measured the amount of F. nucleatum DNA in colorectal tumor tissue using a quantitative PCR assay and equally dichotomized F. nucleatum-positive cases (high vs. low). We used multivariable logistic regression analysis to examine the relationship of a bowel subsite variable (rectum, rectosigmoid junction, sigmoid colon, descending colon, splenic flexure, transverse colon, hepatic flexure, ascending colon, and cecum) with the amount of F. nucleatum. RESULTS: The proportion of F. nucleatum-high colorectal cancers gradually increased from rectal cancers (2.5%; 4/157) to cecal cancers (11%; 19/178), with a statistically significant linear trend along all subsites (P<0.0001) and little evidence of non-linearity. The proportion of F. nucleatum-low cancers was higher in rectal, ascending colon, and cecal cancers than in cancers of middle segments. CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of F. nucleatum-high colorectal cancers gradually increases from rectum to cecum. Our data support the colorectal continuum model that reflects pathogenic influences of the gut microbiota on neoplastic and immune cells and challenges the prevailing two-colon (proximal vs. distal) dichotomy paradigm.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
About 50%-60% of incident colorectal cancer cases in the United States are estimated to be attributable to modifiable risk factors.
“Approximately 50%–60% of incident cases of CRC in the US are estimated to be attributable to modifiable risk factors4, 5”
From Influence of the Gut Microbiome, Diet, and Environment on Risk of Colorectal Cancer (2020) · cites this paper as [5]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 67 · Cited by 284
- Authors
- Mima, K., Cao, Y., Chan, A. T., Qian, Z. R., Nowak, J. A., Masugi, Y., Shi, Y., Song, M., da Silva, A., Gu, M., Li, W., Hamada, T., Kosumi, K., Hanyuda, A., Liu, L., Kostic, A. D., Giannakis, M., Bullman, S., Brennan, C. A., Milner, D. A., Baba, H., Garraway, L. A., Meyerhardt, J. A., Garrett, W. S., Huttenhower, C., Meyerson, M., Giovannucci, E. L., Fuchs, C. S., Nishihara, R., & Ogino, S.
- Affiliations
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- Broad Institute (US)
- Corresponding author
- Ogino, Shuji
- ORCID
- Mima, Kosuke
- Cao, Yin
- Chan, Andrew T
- Qian, Zhi Rong
- Nowak, Jonathan A
- Masugi, Yohei
- Shi, Yan
- Song, Mingyang
- Gu, Mancang
- Hamada, Tsuyoshi
- Kosumi, Keisuke
- Hanyuda, Akiko
- Liu, Li
- Kostic, Aleksandar D
- Giannakis, Marios
- Bullman, Susan
- Brennan, Caitlin A
- Milner, Danny A
- Baba, Hideo
- Garraway, Levi A
- Meyerhardt, Jeffrey A
- Garrett, Wendy S
- Huttenhower, Curtis
- Meyerson, Matthew
- Giovannucci, Edward L
- Fuchs, Charles S
- Nishihara, Reiko
- Ogino, Shuji
- Venue
- Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology
- Published
- 2016-11
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- e200
- ISSN
- 2155-384X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC5543402
- OpenAlex
- W2547480541
- Cited by
- 284
- References
- 67
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 17
- FWCI
- 15.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (KL2TR001100)
- National Cancer Institute (P50CA127003, R01CA151993, R01CA118553, R01CA137178, R35CA197735, P01CA087969, R01CA169141, P01CA055075, UM1CA186107, UM1CA167552, K07CA190673, R01CA154426)
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P30DK043351)
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
- Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
- Keywords
- Fusobacterium nucleatum, colorectal cancer, tumor location, rectal cancer, cecal cancer, gut microbiota, colorectal carcinogenesis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review