The DOI matches its Crossref record.
China declared world's largest producer of scientific articles
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“A member of the World Federation for Culture Collections (”
From The history, landscape, and outlook of human cell line authentication and security (2024) · cites this paper as [150]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–212 of 212
Teaching English for Research Publication Purposes in China: Developments and Challenges
Li, Y., & Cargill, M. (2025) · The WAC Clearinghouse; University Press of Colorado eBooks · doi:10.37514/int-b.2025.2944.2.09
Lillis, T. (2025) · The WAC Clearinghouse; University Press of Colorado eBooks · doi:10.37514/int-b.2025.2944.2.04
Flowerdew, J. (2025) · The WAC Clearinghouse; University Press of Colorado eBooks · doi:10.37514/int-b.2025.2944.2.10
Martín, P., & Pérez, I. K. L. (2025) · The WAC Clearinghouse; University Press of Colorado eBooks · doi:10.37514/int-b.2025.2944.2.08
From Local to Global: Navigating the Complexities of International Publishing for Uzbek Academics
Radjabzade, S., & Makovskaya, L. (2025) · The WAC Clearinghouse; University Press of Colorado eBooks · doi:10.37514/int-b.2025.2944.2.05
Coloniality of Knowledge as Co-creation
Navarro, F. (2025) · The WAC Clearinghouse; University Press of Colorado eBooks · doi:10.37514/int-b.2025.2944.2.02
Greasing the wheels of collaboration: Evidence from transfers of university presidents in China
Xue, C., & Zhang, L. (2026) · Journal of Urban Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jue.2026.103890
CanCan, W., & Samuel, M. S. G. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.7235131
Alakbari, F. S., Ibrahim, A. F., & Abdelnaby, M. M. (2026) · Results in Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.rineng.2026.112351
Wu, F., Xiong, F., Jin, S., Hu, X., Zhang, L., & Li, S. (2026) · Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fcimb.2026.1956027
Bazhin, V. Y., Gordevnin, N. A., & Demidov, S. S. (2026) · International Journal of Engineering · doi:10.5829/ije.2027.40.05b.17
Metadata
- Authors
- Tollefson, J.
- Corresponding author
- Tollefson, Jeff
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2018-01-18
- Volume
- 553
- Issue
- 7689
- Pages
- 390-390
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2784610203
- Cited by
- 208
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 8
- Type
- other
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Academic Writing and Publishing
- Keywords
- scientific publications, research output
- MeSH terms
- Authorship, China, Science, United States, Bibliometrics, Technology Transfer, Research Report, Inventions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review