US lawmakers propose plan to reduce primate research at National Institutes of Health
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A 2019 spending bill passed by the U.S. House of Representatives includes a directive to the National Institutes of Health to accelerate the replacement of nonhuman primates in research with alternative research models.
“A 2019 spending bill passed by the U.S. House of Representatives includes a directive to the National Institutes of Health to accelerate the replacement of nonhuman primates in research with alternative research models (83).”
From Limitations of Animal Studies for Predicting Toxicity in Clinical Trials (2019) · cites this paper as [83]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Limitations of Animal Studies for Predicting Toxicity in Clinical Trials
Van Norman, G. A. (2019) · JACC: Basic to Translational Science · doi:10.1016/j.jacbts.2019.10.008 · Cited by 709 · see citing works
- Authors
- Reardon, S.
- Corresponding author
- Reardon, Sara
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2019-05-09
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2943889835
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 2
- Type
- other
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal testing and alternatives
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
- Social Sciences › Law › Animal Law and Welfare
- Keywords
- primate research, non-human primates, NIH funding, animal research policy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
