The DOI matches its Crossref record.
What costs half a year’s pay for African scholars? Open access
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Also, due to resource scarcity and resource mismanagement, many African institutions may put subscriptions to archaeology journals at the bottom of their priorities, making it difficult for Africa-based scholars to access current literature in their field and publish in high profile journals (also see Mekonnen et al., 2021).”
From Doing Archaeology in a Turbulent Time (2021) · cites this paper as Mekonnen et al., 2021
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Doing Archaeology in a Turbulent Time
Ogundiran, A. (2021) · African Archaeological Review · doi:10.1007/s10437-021-09460-8 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Mekonnen, A., Downs, C., Effiom, E. O., Razafindratsima, O., Stenseth, N. C., & Chapman, C. A.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2021-08-10
- Volume
- 596
- Issue
- 7871
- Pages
- 189-189
- ISSN
- 0028-0836
- 1476-4687
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
