The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How I tackled post-PhD imposter syndrome
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This cascade of challenges may lead to escalating anxiety, pushing individuals into a stage of failure accompanied by severe physical and mental reactions, and potentially contributing to the “pretender syndrome” involving self-denial (Inouye, 2021).”
From A narrative review of anxiety regulation in PhD students based on Green model (2024) · cites this paper as Inouye, 2021
Citations
Cites
Social comparison, social media, and self-esteem.
Vogel, E. A., Rose, J. P., Roberts, L. R., & Eckles, K. (2014) · Psychology of Popular Media Culture · doi:10.1037/ppm0000047 · Cited by 1,418
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Cahusac de Caux, B. in Wellbeing in Doctoral Education (eds Pretorius, L., Macaulay, L. & Cahusac de Caux, B.) 127–139 (Springer, 2019). · DOI
- Chan, H., Mazzucchelli, T. G. & Rees, C. S. Higher Educ. Res. Dev. 40, 446–460 (2021). · DOI
- Barr-Walker, J., Werner, D. A., Kellermeyer, L. & Bass, M. B. Evid. Based Lib. Inf. Practice 15, 24–31 (2020). · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A narrative review of anxiety regulation in PhD students based on Green model
Ma, Y., Yu, A., Ma, H., Zhao, Y., Liu, X., Zhai, H., & Gao, Y. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1351386 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Inouye, K.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2021-08-13
- ISSN
- 0028-0836
- 1476-4687
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review