The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Artificial intelligence is breaking patent law
Open accessAbstract
The patent system assumes that inventors are human. Inventions devised by machines require their own intellectual property law and an international treaty. The patent system assumes that inventors are human. Inventions devised by machines require their own intellectual property law and an international treaty.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Inventions devised by AI are already causing a fundamental rethink of patent law 9 ,”
From ChatGPT: five priorities for research (2023) · cites this paper as [9]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Stanková, E. Cambridge Law J. 80, 338–365 (2021). · DOI
- Abbott, R. UCLA Law Rev. 66, 2–52 (2019).
- Abbott, R. Washburn Law J. 60, 429–444 (2020).
- Afshar, M. S. Hastings Sci. Technol. Law J. 13, 55–72 (2022).
- Kim, D. GRUR Int. 69, 443–456 (2020). · DOI
- Schuster, W. M. Washington Lee Law Rev. 75, 1945–2004 (2018).
Cited by
ChatGPT: five priorities for research
van Dis, E. A. M., Bollen, J., Zuidema, W., van Rooij, R., & Bockting, C. L. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/d41586-023-00288-7 · Cited by 1,842
Metadata
- Authors
- George, A., & Walsh, T.
- Affiliations
- UNSW Sydney (AU)
- Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
- Corresponding author
- George, Alexandra
- Walsh, Toby
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2022-05-24
- Volume
- 605
- Issue
- 7911
- Pages
- 616-618
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W4282915387
- Cited by
- 32
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 10 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 4
- FWCI
- 2.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- public-domain
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- www.springer.com/tdm (vor)
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion, public-domain)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
- Social Sciences › Law › Intellectual Property Law
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Intellectual Property and Patents
- Keywords
- artificial intelligence, patent law, inventorship, intellectual property, international treaties
- MeSH terms
- Artificial Intelligence, Legislation as Topic, Patents as Topic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
