Are ChatGPT and AlphaCode going to replace programmers?
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Physicians can improve their critical thinking skills more broadly rather than focusing on rote learning.
“Rather than focusing on rote learning, physicians can improve their critical thinking skills more broadly [83].”
From Ethical Considerations of Using ChatGPT in Health Care (2023) · cites this paper as [83]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 1 · Cited by 138
- Authors
- Castelvecchi, D.
- Corresponding author
- Castelvecchi, Davide
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2022-12-08
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W4311824882
- Cited by
- 138
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 64 · 2022: 2
- Type
- other
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Research
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
- Keywords
- ChatGPT, large language models, automatic code generation, software engineering, future of programming, OpenAI, DeepMind
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
