Cited by 182Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchPharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

FDA approves Alzheimer’s drug lecanemab amid safety concerns

Reardon, Sara·2023·Nature

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/d41586-023-00030-3

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 182

Metadata

Authors
Reardon, S.
Corresponding author
Reardon, Sara
Venue
Nature
Published
2023-01-07
Volume
613
Issue
7943
Pages
227-228
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W4315434323
Cited by
180
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 66 · 2023: 65
Type
other
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
Keywords
lecanemab, Alzheimer's disease, drug approval, drug safety, adverse events, anti-amyloid therapy, FDA
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Humans, United States, United States Food and Drug Administration, Drug Approval, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized, Patient Safety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review