These tools help visually impaired scientists read data and journals
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Emerging initiatives demonstrate practical pathways, such as accessible lab design, improved PDF remediation, and inclusive conference protocols.
“Emerging initiatives demonstrate practical pathways, such as accessible lab design that reimagines physical tools and spaces [72], improved PDF remediation that addresses infrastructural inaccessibility [61], and inclusive conference protocols that restructure community norms of academic exchange [43].”
From "I Don't Trust Any Professional Research Tool": A Re-Imagination of Knowledge Production Workflows by, with, and for Blind and Low-Vision Researchers (2026) · cites this paper as [43]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [3]Wang, L. L. et al. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/ abs/2105.00076 (2021). · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Khan, O., & Seo, J. (2026) · Proceedings of the 2026 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3772318.3791242 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Katsnelson, A.
- Corresponding author
- Katsnelson, Alla
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2023-03-06
- Volume
- 615
- Issue
- 7951
- Pages
- 362-363
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W4323319010
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 0.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Academic Publishing and Open Access
- Keywords
- accessibility, assistive technology, screen readers, scientific literature access, data accessibility, accessible software
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Periodicals as Topic, Reading, Research Personnel, Software, Persons with Visual Disabilities, Visually Impaired Persons, Research Report
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
