Cited by 16Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical InnovationsEEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesEthics and Social Impacts of AI

Mind-reading machines are here: is it time to worry?

Reardon, Sara·2023·Nature

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/d41586-023-01486-z

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Reardon, S.
Corresponding author
Reardon, Sara
Venue
Nature
Published
2023-05-02
Volume
617
Issue
7960
Pages
236-236
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W4367672454
Cited by
16
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6
FWCI
2.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Keywords
neuroethics, mental privacy, imagined speech, brain decoding, artificial intelligence, brain scans
MeSH terms
Artificial Intelligence, Brain Mapping, Humans, Thinking, Privacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review