‘ChatGPT detector’ catches AI-generated papers with unprecedented accuracy
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
GenAI cannot address structural problems in teaching and academic research.
“Some have also importantly pointed out that GenAI cannot address structural problems in teaching and academic research (e.g., pressures to produce research and publish) [39].”
From Generative artificial intelligence in higher education: Evidence from an analysis of institutional policies and guidelines (2025) · cites this paper as [39]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
McDonald, N., Johri, A., Ali, A., & Collier, A. H. (2025) · Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans · doi:10.1016/j.chbah.2025.100121 · Cited by 295 · see citing works
Liu, J. Q. J., Hui, K. T. K., Al Zoubi, F., Zhou, Z. Z. X., Samartzis, D., Yu, C. C. H., Chang, J. R., & Wong, A. Y. L. (2024) · International Journal for Educational Integrity · doi:10.1007/s40979-024-00155-6 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Kim, S.-J. (2024) · Science Editing · doi:10.6087/kcse.343 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Casu, M., Guarnera, L., Caponnetto, P., & Battiato, S. (2024) · Forensic Science International: Digital Investigation · doi:10.1016/j.fsidi.2024.301795 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Yin, S., Huang, S., Xue, P., Xu, Z., Lian, Z., Ye, C., Ma, S., Liu, M., Hu, Y., Lu, P., et al. (2025) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12916-025-03899-1 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
- Authors
- Prillaman, M.
- Corresponding author
- Prillaman, McKenzie
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2023-11-06
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W4388408285
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 10
- Type
- other
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Authorship Attribution and Profiling
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Academic integrity and plagiarism
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
- Keywords
- AI-generated text detection, machine learning, writing style features, academic integrity, plagiarism detection
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
