‘Without these tools, I’d be lost’: how generative AI aids in accessibility
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Scientists with disabilities have expressed concerns that those working on AI guidelines do not consider how these tools can help people with disabilities or other under-represented groups.
“Yet, scientists with disabilities have expressed concerns that those working on AI guidelines do not consider how these tools can help people with disabilities or other under-represented groups (Heidt, 2024).”
From Exploring the role of generative AI in higher education: Semi-structured interviews with students with disabilities (2025) · cites this paper as Heidt, 2024
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 3 · Cited by 16
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Amano, T. et al. PLoS Biol. 21, e3002184 (2023).
- Tan, K. H., Jospa, M. E. A. W., Mohd-Said, N.-E. & Awang, M. M. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 18, 12754 (2021).
- Glazko, K. S. et al. Proc. 25th Int. ACM SIGACCESS Conf. Comput. Accessibility 2023, 99 (2023).
- Authors
- Heidt, A.
- Corresponding author
- Heidt, Amanda
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2024-04-08
- Volume
- 628
- Issue
- 8007
- Pages
- 462-463
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W4394577154
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 6.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
- Keywords
- generative AI, accessibility, academic research, AI adoption barriers, disability, inclusive research
- MeSH terms
- Artificial Intelligence, Humans, Hydrolases, Research Personnel, Social Justice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
