CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 12Artificial Intelligence ApplicationsScientific Computing and Data ManagementArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

How AI agents will change research: a scientist’s guide

Gibney, Elizabeth·2025·Nature
DOI 10.1038/d41586-025-03246-7
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/d41586-025-03246-7

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Gibney, E.
Corresponding author
Gibney, Elizabeth
Venue
Nature
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2025-10-03
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
DOI
10.1038/d41586-025-03246-7
OpenAlex
W4414799267
Cited by
12
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 12
FWCI
4.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Scientific Computing and Data Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
AI agents, artificial intelligence in research, scientific workflows, research automation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review