Passive and active roles of fat-free mass in the control of energy intake and body composition regulation
Open accessAbstract
While putative feedback signals arising from adipose tissue are commonly assumed to provide the molecular links between the body's long-term energy requirements and energy intake, the available evidence suggests that the lean body or fat-free mass (FFM) also plays a role in the drive to eat. A distinction must, however, be made between a 'passive' role of FFM in driving energy intake, which is likely to be mediated by 'energy-sensing' mechanisms that translate FFM-induced energy requirements to energy intake, and a more 'active' role of FFM in the drive to eat through feedback signaling between FFM deficit and energy intake. Consequently, a loss of FFM that results from dieting or sedentarity should be viewed as a risk factor for weight regain and increased fatness not only because of the impact of the FFM deficit in lowering the maintenance energy requirement but also because of the body's attempt to restore FFM by overeating-a phenomenon referred to as 'collateral fattening'. A better understanding of these passive and active roles of FFM in the control of energy intake will necessitate the elucidation of peripheral signals and energy-sensing mechanisms that drive hunger and appetite, with implications for both obesity prevention and its management.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
For every increase in body fat, fat-free mass changes in parallel by approximately 25% (the one quarter rule).
“for any increment in body fat, a parallel change in FFM occurs, corresponding approximately to 25%.”
From Critical appraisal of definitions and diagnostic criteria for sarcopenic obesity based on a systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as [111]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 34 · Cited by 128
- Authors
- Dulloo, A. G., Jacquet, J., Miles-Chan, J. L., & Schutz, Y.
- Affiliations
- University of Fribourg (CH)
- Corresponding author
- Dulloo, A G
- Venue
- European Journal of Clinical Nutrition
- Published
- 2016-12-14
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 353-357
- ISSN
- 0954-3007 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-5640
- OpenAlex
- W2564091153
- Cited by
- 128
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 9
- FWCI
- 1.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- European Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- reroDoc Digital Library (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (310030)
- Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (152870, 310030)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Adipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Adipose Tissue and Metabolism
- Keywords
- fat-free mass, energy intake regulation, energy sensing, leptin, weight regain, dieting, sedentary behavior, obesity prevention, obesity treatment
- MeSH terms
- Appetite, Appetite Regulation, Basal Metabolism, Body Composition, Body Weight, Energy Intake, Dietary Proteins, Humans, Hunger, Hyperphagia, Obesity, Risk Factors, Starvation, Body Mass Index
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review