Genotype-phenotype correlations in down syndrome identified by array CGH in 30 cases of partial trisomy and partial monosomy chromosome 21
Open accessAbstract
Down syndrome (DS) is one of the most frequent congenital birth defects, and the most common genetic cause of mental retardation. In most cases, DS results from the presence of an extra copy of chromosome 21. DS has a complex phenotype, and a major goal of DS research is to identify genotype-phenotype correlations. Cases of partial trisomy 21 and other HSA21 rearrangements associated with DS features could identify genomic regions associated with specific phenotypes. We have developed a BAC array spanning HSA21q and used array comparative genome hybridization (aCGH) to enable high-resolution mapping of pathogenic partial aneuploidies and unbalanced translocations involving HSA21. We report the identification and mapping of 30 pathogenic chromosomal aberrations of HSA21 consisting of 19 partial trisomies and 11 partial monosomies for different segments of HSA21. The breakpoints have been mapped to within approximately 85 kb. The majority of the breakpoints (26 of 30) for the partial aneuploidies map within a 10-Mb region. Our data argue against a single DS critical region. We identify susceptibility regions for 25 phenotypes for DS and 27 regions for monosomy 21. However, most of these regions are still broad, and more cases are needed to narrow down the phenotypic maps to a reasonable number of candidate genomic elements per phenotype.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A targeted gene or set of genes hypothesized to have a major influence on a phenotype due to overexpression in DS may be a therapeutic focus.
“Alternatively, a targeted gene or set of genes hypothesized to have a major influence on a phenotype due to overexpression in DS may be a therapeutic focus (Korbel et al., 2009; Lyle et al., 2009).”
From Sex-specific developmental alterations in DYRK1A expression in the brain of a Down syndrome mouse model (2024) · cites this paper as Lyle et al., 2009
The Introduction and Genotype–phenotype correlations section say that identifying chromosome 21 genes or small regions contributing to specific Down syndrome phenotypes is a goal of the research. They do not propose targeting those genes as a therapeutic approach or establish that overexpression of a particular gene or set of genes has a major influence on a phenotype. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 51 · Cited by 331
Research works printed but not linked: 49
- Epstein CJ: Down syndrome (trisomy 21); in Scriver CR, Beaudet AL, Sly WS, Valle D (eds): New York: McGraw-Hill, 2001, pp 1223 -1256.
- Antonarakis SE, Lyle R, Dermitzakis ET, Reymond A, Deutsch S: Chromosome 21 and Down syndrome: from genomics to pathophysiology. Nat Rev Genet 2004; 5: 725.
- Korenberg JR, Bradley C, Disteche CM: Down syndrome: molecular mapping of the congenital heart disease and duodenal stenosis. Am J Hum Genet 1992; 50: 294.
- Sinet PM, Theophile D, Rahmani Z et al: Mapping of the Down syndrome phenotype on chromosome 21 at the molecular level. Biomed Pharmacother 1994; 48: 247.
- Korenberg JR, Chen XN, Schipper R et al: Down syndrome phenotypes: the consequences of chromosomal imbalance. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1994; 91: 4997.
- Barlow GM, Chen XN, Shi ZY et al: Down syndrome congenital heart disease: a narrowed region and a candidate gene. Genet Med 2001; 3: 91.
- McCormick MK, Schinzel A, Petersen MB et al: Molecular genetic approach to the characterization of the ''Down syndrome region'' of chromosome 21. Genomics 1989; 5: 325.
- Delabar JM, Theophile D, Rahmani Z et al: Molecular mapping of twenty-four features of Down syndrome on chromosome 21. Eur J Hum Genet 1993; 1: 114.
- Reeves RH, Irving NG, Moran TH et al: A mouse model for Down syndrome exhibits learning and behavioural deficits. Nat Genet 1995; 11: 177.
- Olson LE, Richtsmeier JT, Leszl J, Reeves RH: A chromosome 21 critical region does not cause specific down syndrome pheno- types. Science S 2004; 306: 687.
- Chrast R, Scott HS, Papasavvas MP et al: The mouse brain transcriptome by SAGE: differences in gene expression between P30 brains of the partial trisomy 16 mouse model of Down syndrome (Ts65Dn) and normals. Genome Res 2000; 10: 2006.
- FitzPatrick DR, Ramsay J, McGill NI, Shade M, Carothers AD, Hastie ND: Transcriptome analysis of human autosomal trisomy. Hum Mol Genet 2002; 11: 3249.
- Mao R, Zielke CL, Ronald Zielke H, Pevsner J: Global up- regulation of chromosome 21 gene expression in the developing down syndrome brain. Genomics 2003; 81: 457.
- Saran NG, Pletcher MT, Natale JE, Cheng Y, Reeves RH: Global disruption of the cerebellar transcriptome in a down syndrome mouse model. Hum Mol Genet 2003; 12: 2013.
- Lyle R, Gehrig C, Neergaard-Henrichsen C, Deutsch S, Antonarakis ES: Gene expression from the aneuploid chromosome in a trisomy mouse model of down syndrome. Genome Res 2004; 14: 1268.
- Rahmani Z, Blouin JL, Creau-Goldberg N et al: Critical role of the D21S55 region on chromosome 21 in the pathogenesis of Down syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1989; 86: 5958.
- Korenberg JR, Kawashima H, Pulst SM et al: Molecular definition of a region of chromosome 21 that causes features of the Down syndrome phenotype. Am J Hum Genet 1990; 47: 236.
- Olson LE, Roper RJ, Sengstaken CL et al: Trisomy for the Down syndrome ''critical region'' is necessary but not sufficient for brain phenotypes of trisomic mice. Hum Mol Genet 2007; 16: 774 -782.
- Sebat J, Lakshmi B, Troge J et al: Large-scale copy number polymorphism in the human genome. Science 2004; 305: 525.
- Fiegler H, Carr P, Douglas EJ et al: DNA microarrays for comparative genomic hybridization based on DOP-PCR amplifi- cation of BAC and PAC clones. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2003; 36: 361.
- Jackson JF, North ERr, Thomas JG: Clinical diagnosis of Down's syndrome. Clin Genet S 1976; 9: 483.
- Chettouh Z, Croquette MF, Delobel B et al: Molecular mapping of 21 features associated with partial monosomy 21: involvement of the APP-SOD1 region. Am J Hum Genet 1995; 57:6 2 .
- Barnicoat AJ, Bonneau JL, Boyd E et al: Down syndrome with partial duplication and del (21) syndrome: study protocol and call for collaboration. Study I: clinical assessment. Clin Genet 1996; 49: 20.
- Bartsch O, Petersen MB, Stuhlmann I et al: ''Compensatory'' uniparental disomy of chromosome 21 in two cases. J Med Genet 1994; 31: 534.
- Ehling D, Kennerknecht I, Junge A et al: Mild phenotype in two unrelated patients with a partial deletion of 21q22.2-q22.3 defined by FISH and molecular studies. Am J Med Genet A 2004; 131: 265.
- Huret JL, Leonard C, Chery M et al: Monosomy 21q: two cases of del(21q) and review of the literature. Clin Genet 1995; 48: 140.
- Korenberg JR, Kalousek DK, Anneren G et al: Deletion of chromosome 21 and normal intelligence: molecular definition of the lesion. Hum Genet 1991; 87: 112.
- Nielsen F, Tranebjaerg L: A case of partial monosomy 21q22.2 associated with Rieger's syndrome. J Med Genet 1984; 21: 218.
- Theodoropoulos DS, Cowan JM, Elias ER, Cole C: Physical findings in 21q22 deletion suggest critical region for 21q- phenotype in q22. Am J Med Genet 1995; 59: 161.
- Valero R, Marfany G, Gil-Benso R et al: Molecular characterisation of partial chromosome 21 aneuploidies by fluorescent PCR. JMed Genet 1999; 36: 694.
- Yamamoto Y, Ogasawara N, Gotoh A, Komiya H, Nakai H, Kuroki Y: A case of 21q -syndrome with normal SOD-1 activity. Hum Genet 1979; 48: 321.
- Kim UJ, Birren BW, Slepak T et al: Construction and characteriza- tion of a human bacterial artificial chromosome library. Genomics 1996; 34: 213.
- Lingjaerde OC, Baumbusch LO, Liestol K, Glad IK, Borresen-Dale AL: CGH-Explorer: a program for analysis of array-CGH data. Bioinformatics 2005; 21: 821.
- Kent WJ: BLAT -The BLAST-like alignment tool. Genome Res 2002; 12: 656.
- Blouin JL, Aurias A, Creau-Goldberg N et al: Cytogenetic and molecular analysis of a de novo tandem duplication of chromo- some 21. Hum Genet 1991; 88: 167.
- Kondo Y, Mizuno S, Ohara K et al: Two cases of partial trisomy 21 (pter-q22.1) without the major features of Down syndrome. Am J Med Genet A S 2006; 140: 227.
- Raoul O, Carpentier S, Dutrillaux B, Mallet R, Lejeune J: Partial trisomy of chromosome 21 by maternal translocation t(15;21) (q26.2; q21). Ann Genet 1976; 19: 187.
- Rethore MO, Dutrillaux B: Translocation 46,XX, t(15; 21) (q13; q22,1) in the mother of 2 children with partial trisomy 15 and monosomy 21. Ann Genet 1973; 16: 271.
- Orti R, Megarbane A, Maunoury C, Van Broeckhoven C, Sinet PM, Delabar JM: High-resolution physical mapping of a 6.7-Mb YAC contig spanning a region critical for the monosomy 21 pheno- type in 21q21.3-q22.1. Genomics 1997; 43:2 5 .
- Shaw-Smith C, Redon R, Rickman L et al: Microarray based comparative genomic hybridisation (array-CGH) detects submi- croscopic chromosomal deletions and duplications in patients with learning disability/mental retardation and dysmorphic features. J Med Genet 2004; 41: 241.
- Mikkelsen M, Vestermark S: Karyotype 45,XX,-21/46,XX,21q-in an infant with symptoms of G-deletion syndrome I. J Med Genet 1974; 11: 389.
- Pennington BF, Moon J, Edgin J, Stedron J, Nadel L: The neuropsychology of Down syndrome: evidence for hippocampal dysfunction. Child Dev 2003; 74: 75.
- Delabar JM, Aflalo-Rattenbac R, Creau N: Developmental defects in trisomy 21 and mouse models. ScientificWorldJournal 2006; 6:1945.
- Tubman TR, Shields MD, Craig BG, Mulholland HC, Nevin NC: Congenital heart disease in Down's syndrome: two-year prospec- tive early screening study. BMJ 1991; 302: 1425.
- Torfs CP, Christianson RE: Anomalies in Down syndrome individuals in a large population-based registry. Am J Med Genet 1998; 77: 431.
- Epstein CJ, Korenberg JR, Anneren G et al: Protocols to establish genotype-phenotype correlations in Down syndrome. Am j Hum Genet 1991; 49: 207.
- Hattori M, Fujiyama A, Taylor TD et al: The DNA sequence of human chromosome 21. Nature 2000; 405: 311.
- Korenberg JR, Chen XN, Schipper R et al: Down syndrome phenotypes: the consequences of chromosomal imbalance. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1994; 91: 4997.
- Prandini P, Deutsch S, Lyle R et al: Natural gene-expression variation in Down syndrome modulates the outcome of gene- dosage imbalance. Am J Hum Genet 2007; 81: 252.
- Authors
- Lyle, R., Béna, F., Gagos, S., Gehrig, C., Lopez, G., Schinzel, A., Lespinasse, J., Bottani, A., Dahoun, S., Taine, L., Doco-Fenzy, M., Cornillet-Lefèbvre, P., Pelet, A., Lyonnet, S., Toutain, A., Colleaux, L., Horst, J., Kennerknecht, I., Wakamatsu, N., Descartes, M., Franklin, J. C., Florentin-Arar, L., Kitsiou, S., Aït Yahya-Graison, E., Costantine, M., Sinet, P.-M., Delabar, J. M., & Antonarakis, S. E.
- Affiliations
- University of Geneva (CH)
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux (FR)
- Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades (FR)
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Tours (FR)
- University of Münster (DE)
- Institute for Developmental Research (JP)
- University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
- National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR)
- Université Paris Diderot (FR)
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Lyle, Robert
- Antonarakis, Stylianos E
- ORCID
- Venue
- European Journal of Human Genetics
- Published
- 2008-11-12
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 454-466
- ISSN
- 1018-4813 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-5438
- PMC
- PMC2986205
- OpenAlex
- W2085790004
- Cited by
- 331
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 20
- FWCI
- 21.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- European Journal of Human Genetics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (publishedVersion)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- European Commission
- Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities
- Keywords
- Down syndrome, partial trisomy 21, genotype-phenotype correlation, breakpoint mapping, critical region, unbalanced translocation, BAC array
- MeSH terms
- Abnormalities, Multiple, Chromosome Deletion, Chromosomes, Human, Pair 21, Down Syndrome, Genotype, Humans, Phenotype, Trisomy, Comparative Genomic Hybridization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review