Cited by 272Genetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersLanguage Development and DisordersAutism Spectrum Disorder Research

Shining a light on CNTNAP2: Complex functions to complex disorders

Open access
Rodenas-Cuadrado, Pedro, Ho, Joses, Vernes, Sonja C·2014·European Journal of Human Genetics

Abstract

The genetic basis of complex neurological disorders involving language are poorly understood, partly due to the multiple additive genetic risk factors that are thought to be responsible. Furthermore, these conditions are often syndromic in that they have a range of endophenotypes that may be associated with the disorder and that may be present in different combinations in patients. However, the emergence of individual genes implicated across multiple disorders has suggested that they might share similar underlying genetic mechanisms. The CNTNAP2 gene is an excellent example of this, as it has recently been implicated in a broad range of phenotypes including autism spectrum disorder (ASD), schizophrenia, intellectual disability, dyslexia and language impairment. This review considers the evidence implicating CNTNAP2 in these conditions, the genetic risk factors and mutations that have been identified in patient and population studies and how these relate to patient phenotypes. The role of CNTNAP2 is examined in the context of larger neurogenetic networks during development and disorder, given what is known regarding the regulation and function of this gene. Understanding the role of CNTNAP2 in diverse neurological disorders will further our understanding of how combinations of individual genetic risk factors can contribute to complex conditions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ejhg.2013.100

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Neuroimaging and polygenic studies demonstrate shared alterations in fronto-striatal and default-mode networks, and overlapping risk loci such as FOXP1 and CNTNAP2 in ADHD and ASD.

    “Neuroimaging and polygenic studies demonstrate shared alterations in fronto-striatal and default-mode networks, and overlapping risk loci such as FOXP1 and CNTNAP2”

    From ADHD in Adulthood: Clinical Presentation, Comorbidities, and Treatment Perspectives (2025) · cites this paper as [46]

    The Mutations of CNTNAP2 section (page unavailable) links CNTNAP2 variants to ASD, reports ADHD among phenotypes associated with CNTNAP2 disruptions, and describes possible alterations in brain networks while cautioning that the imaging findings have not been independently replicated. The Regulation of CNTNAP2 expression section (page unavailable) describes FOXP1–CNTNAP2 links in ASD. Neither passage establishes shared fronto-striatal or default-mode network alterations, or overlapping FOXP1 and CNTNAP2 risk loci, across ADHD and ASD; the claim also overstates the paper’s caution as a demonstration. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 80 · Cited by 272

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Puelles L, Kuwana E, Puelles E et al: Pallial and subpallial derivatives in the embryonic chick and mouse telencephalon, traced by the expression of the genes Dlx-2, Emx-1, Nkx-2.1, Pax-6, and Tbr-1. J Compar Neurol 2000; 424: 409-438.

Authors
Rodenas-Cuadrado, P., Ho, J., & Vernes, S. C.
Affiliations
  • Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics (NL)
  • Centre for Human Genetics (GB)
  • Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
Corresponding author
Vernes, Sonja C
Venue
European Journal of Human Genetics
Published
2013-05-29
Volume
22
Issue
2
Pages
171-178
ISSN
  • 1018-4813 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5438
OpenAlex
W2118922889
Cited by
272
References
80
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 3
FWCI
2.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Human Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
Keywords
CNTNAP2, autism spectrum disorder, schizophrenia, intellectual disability, dyslexia, language impairment, genetic risk factors, genetic mutations, syndromic disorders, endophenotypes, gene expression regulation
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Animals, Humans, Language Development Disorders, Membrane Proteins, Molecular Sequence Data, Nerve Net, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Nervous System Diseases, Risk Factors, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Mutation, Missense, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review