Cited by 164DNA Repair MechanismsTelomeres, Telomerase, and SenescenceFungal and yeast genetics research

Checkpoint-dependent phosphorylation of Exo1 modulates the DNA damage response

Open access
Morin, Isabelle, Ngo, Hien‐Ping, Greenall, Amanda, Zubko, Mikhajlo K, Morrice, Nick, Lydall, David·2008·The EMBO Journal

Abstract

Exo1 is a nuclease involved in mismatch repair, DSB repair, stalled replication fork processing and in the DNA damage response triggered by dysfunctional telomeres. In budding yeast and mice, Exo1 creates single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) at uncapped telomeres. This ssDNA accumulation activates the checkpoint response resulting in cell cycle arrest. Here, we demonstrate that Exo1 is phosphorylated when telomeres are uncapped in cdc13-1 and yku70Delta yeast cells, and in response to the induction of DNA damage. After telomere uncapping, Exo1 phosphorylation depends on components of the checkpoint machinery such as Rad24, Rad17, Rad9, Rad53 and Mec1, but is largely independent of Chk1, Tel1 and Dun1. Serines S372, S567, S587 and S692 of Exo1 were identified as targets for phosphorylation. Furthermore, mutation of these Exo1 residues altered the DNA damage response to uncapped telomeres and camptothecin treatment, in a manner that suggests Exo1 phosphorylation inhibits its activity. We propose that Rad53-dependent Exo1 phosphorylation is involved in a negative feedback loop to limit ssDNA accumulation and DNA damage checkpoint activation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/emboj.2008.171

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Checkpoints actively stimulate repair processes and, in higher eukaryotes, trigger apoptosis when damage cannot be successfully dealt with.

    “The checkpoints also actively stimulate the repair processes [1–9] and, in higher eukaryotes, trigger the apoptotic response, if damage cannot be dealt with successfully [10–12].”

    From Mind the gap: keeping UV lesions in check (2011) · cites this paper as [6]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 70 · Cited by 164

Authors
Morin, I., Ngo, H., Greenall, A., Zubko, M. K., Morrice, N., & Lydall, D.
Affiliations
  • Newcastle University (GB)
  • Manchester Metropolitan University (GB)
  • University of Dundee (GB)
Corresponding author
Lydall, David
Venue
The EMBO Journal
Published
2008-08-28
Volume
27
Issue
18
Pages
2400-2410
ISSN
  • 0261-4189 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2075
OpenAlex
W2072668354
Cited by
164
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 5
FWCI
5.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The EMBO Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
  • e-space (Manchester Metropolitan University) (submittedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (075294)
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Telomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
Keywords
EXO1, protein phosphorylation, DNA damage response, telomere uncapping, single-stranded DNA, Rad53, checkpoint signaling, Rad24, Rad17, Rad9, Mec1, Yku70, camptothecin, negative feedback loop, DNA mismatch repair, DNA double-strand break repair, Saccharomyces cerevisiae
MeSH terms
Cell Cycle, DNA Damage, DNA, Single-Stranded, Exodeoxyribonucleases, Fungal Proteins, Genotype, Models, Biological, Mutation, Phosphorylation, Temperature, Telomere, Genome, Fungal, Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases, Cell Cycle Proteins, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins, Proteomics, Checkpoint Kinase 2

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review