Novel role and mechanism of protein inhibitor of activated STAT1 in spatial learning
Open accessAbstract
By using differential display PCR, we have previously identified 98 cDNA fragments from rat dorsal hippocampus, which are expressed differentially between the fast learners and slow learners from water-maze learning task. One cDNA fragment, which showed a higher expression level in fast learners, encodes the rat protein inhibitor of activated STAT1 (pias1) gene. Spatial training induced a significant increase in PIAS1 expression in rat hippocampus. Transient transfection of the wild-type (WT) PIAS1 plasmid to CA1 neurons facilitated, whereas transfection of PIAS1 siRNA impaired spatial learning in rats. Meanwhile, PIAS1WT increased STAT1 sumoylation, decreased STAT1 DNA binding and decreased STAT1 phosphorylation at Tyr-701 associated with spatial learning facilitation. But PIAS1 siRNA transfection produced an opposite effect on these measures associated with spatial learning impairment. Further, transfection of STAT1 sumoylation mutant impaired spatial acquisition, whereas transfection of STAT1 phosphorylation mutant blocked the impairing effect of PIAS1 siRNA on spatial learning. In this study, we first demonstrate the role of PIAS1 in spatial learning. Both posttranslational modifications (increased sumoylation and decreased phosphorylation) mediate the effect of PIAS1 on spatial learning facilitation.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
STAT1 and STAT3 have roles in hippocampal plasticity.
“STAT1 and STAT3 have roles in hippocampal plasticity178,179.”
From Immune mediators in the brain and peripheral tissues in autism spectrum disorder (2015) · cites this paper as [178]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
DNA binding controls inactivation and nuclear accumulation of the transcription factor Stat1
Meyer, T., Marg, A., Lemke, P., Wiesner, B., & Vinkemeier, U. (2003) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.268003 · Cited by 161 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…pull-down assay for STAT1 DNA-binding activity DNA oligonucleotides containing two GAS elements (underlined) (50-GAGACTCAGTTTCCCGTAAATCGTCCAGTTTCCCGTAAAGACTA TGC-30) were conjugated with a 50 biotin on the sense strand according to the method described previously (Meyer et al, 2003).”
Method
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Chao CC, Ma YL, Lee EHY (2010) BDNF enhances Bcl-xL expression through protein kinase CK2-activated and NF-kB-mediated path- way in rat hippocampus. Brain Pathol (in press)
- Davis HP, Squire LR (1984) Protein synthesis and memory: a review. Psychol Bull 96: 518-559
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Immune mediators in the brain and peripheral tissues in autism spectrum disorder
Estes, M. L., & McAllister, A. K. (2015) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3978 · Cited by 514 · see citing works
Galectin-3 promotes Aβ oligomerization and Aβ toxicity in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease
Tao, C.-C., Cheng, K.-M., Ma, Y.-L., Hsu, W.-L., Chen, Y.-C., Fuh, J.-L., Lee, W.-J., Chao, C.-C., & Lee, E. H. Y. (2020) · Cell Death & Differentiation · doi:10.1038/s41418-019-0348-z · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Self-citationNagakura, I., Van Wart, A., Petravicz, J., Tropea, D., & Sur, M. (2014) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0189-14.2014 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
- Authors
- Tai, D. J. C., Hsu, W. L., Liu, Y. C., Ma, Y. L., & Lee, E. H. Y.
- Affiliations
- Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Academia Sinica (TW)
- National Chengchi University (TW)
- Corresponding author
- Lee, Eminy H Y
- Venue
- The EMBO Journal
- Published
- 2010-11-19
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 205-220
- ISSN
- 0261-4189 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2075
- PMC
- PMC3020114
- OpenAlex
- W2136315777
- Cited by
- 47
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 1.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- The EMBO Journal (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Council
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cytokine Signaling Pathways and Interactions
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
- Keywords
- PIAS1, STAT1, spatial learning, hippocampus, CA1 neurons, SUMOylation, STAT1 phosphorylation, siRNA knockdown, water maze learning, post-translational modification
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Cells, Cultured, DNA, Gene Expression Regulation, Hippocampus, Male, Mutation, Phosphorylation, Transfection, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Maze Learning, RNA, Small Interfering, STAT1 Transcription Factor, Protein Inhibitors of Activated STAT, Rats, Sumoylation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review