Cited by 136RNA Research and SplicingGenomics and Chromatin DynamicsRNA and protein synthesis mechanisms

RNA polymerase II kinetics in polo polyadenylation signal selection

Open access
Pinto, Pedro A B, Henriques, Telmo, Freitas, Marta O, Martins, Torcato, Domingues, Rita G, Wyrzykowska, Paulina S, Coelho, Paula A, Carmo, Alexandre M +3 more·2011·The EMBO Journal

Abstract

Regulated alternative polyadenylation is an important feature of gene expression, but how gene transcription rate affects this process remains to be investigated. polo is a cell-cycle gene that uses two poly(A) signals in the 3' untranslated region (UTR) to produce alternative messenger RNAs that differ in their 3'UTR length. Using a mutant Drosophila strain that has a lower transcriptional elongation rate, we show that transcription kinetics can determine alternative poly(A) site selection. The physiological consequences of incorrect polo poly(A) site choice are of vital importance; transgenic flies lacking the distal poly(A) signal cannot produce the longer transcript and die at the pupa stage due to a failure in the proliferation of the precursor cells of the abdomen, the histoblasts. This is due to the low translation efficiency of the shorter transcript produced by proximal poly(A) site usage. Our results show that correct polo poly(A) site selection functions to provide the correct levels of protein expression necessary for histoblast proliferation, and that the kinetics of RNA polymerase II have an important role in the mechanism of alternative polyadenylation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/emboj.2011.156

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • On several genes possessing alternative poly(A) sites, a slow RNA Pol II mutant shows a switch to upstream poly(A) sites, while a fast mutant shows a slight downstream switch.

    “On several genes possessing alternative poly(A) sites, a slow RNA Pol II mutant shows a switch to the use of upstream poly(A) sites (Pinto et al, 2011; Liu et al, 2017; Geisberg et al, 2020; Yague‐Sanz et al, 2020), while a fast RNA Pol II mutant shows a slight downstream switch in poly(A) site usage (Geisberg et al, 2020).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 97 · Cited by 136

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Sullivan W, Ashburner M, Hawley RS (eds) (2000) Drosophila Protocols. Cold Spring Harbor, New York, USA: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press

Authors
Pinto, P. A. B., Henriques, T., Freitas, M. O., Martins, T., Domingues, R. G., Wyrzykowska, P. S., Coelho, P. A., Carmo, A. M., Sunkel, C. E., Proudfoot, N. J., & Moreira, A.
Affiliations
  • Universidade do Porto (PT)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Moreira, Alexandra
Venue
The EMBO Journal
Published
2011-05-20
Volume
30
Issue
12
Pages
2431-2444
ISSN
  • 0261-4189 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2075
OpenAlex
W2149146886
Cited by
136
References
97
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 10
FWCI
5.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The EMBO Journal (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust
  • Headcase Cancer Trust
  • Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale
  • Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
  • European Regional Development Fund
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
Keywords
alternative polyadenylation, poly(A) site selection, RNA polymerase II, 3' untranslated region, translation efficiency, Drosophila, cell cycle genes, mRNA isoforms
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Survival, Drosophila melanogaster, Kinetics, Poly A, RNA Polymerase II, Genetic Variation, Signal Transduction, Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases, 3' Untranslated Regions, Polyadenylation, Drosophila Proteins, Animals, Genetically Modified, Cell Proliferation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review