The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Why do cellular proteins linked to K63‐polyubiquitin chains not associate with proteasomes?
Open accessAbstract
Although cellular proteins conjugated to K48‐linked Ub chains are targeted to proteasomes, proteins conjugated to K63‐ubiquitin chains are directed to lysosomes. However, pure 26S proteasomes bind and degrade K48‐ and K63‐ubiquitinated substrates similarly. Therefore, we investigated why K63‐ubiquitinated proteins are not degraded by proteasomes. We show that mammalian cells contain soluble factors that selectively bind to K63 chains and inhibit or prevent their association with proteasomes. Using ubiquitinated proteins as affinity ligands, we found that the main cellular proteins that associate selectively with K63 chains and block their binding to proteasomes are ESCRT0 (Endosomal Sorting Complex Required for Transport) and its components, STAM and Hrs. In vivo, knockdown of ESCRT0 confirmed that it is required to block binding of K63‐ubiquitinated molecules to the proteasome. In addition, the Rad23 proteins, especially hHR23B, were found to bind specifically to K48‐ubiquitinated proteins and to stimulate proteasome binding. The specificities of these proteins for K48‐ or K63‐ubiquitin chains determine whether a ubiquitinated protein is targeted for proteasomal degradation or delivered instead to the endosomal‐lysosomal pathway.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Macromolecular crowding: obvious but underappreciated
Ellis, R. J. (2001) · Trends in Biochemical Sciences · doi:10.1016/s0968-0004(01)01938-7 · Cited by 2,309
Cited by
Tau in physiology and pathology
Wang, Y., & Mandelkow, E. (2016) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn.2015.1 · Cited by 2,251
The logic of the 26S proteasome.
Collins, G. A., & Goldberg, A. L. (2017) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.04.023 · Cited by 933
Self-citationDeubiquitylases From Genes to Organism
Clague, M. J., Barsukov, I., Coulson, J. M., Liu, H., Rigden, D. J., & Urbé, S. (2013) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00002.2013 · Cited by 425
The recognition of ubiquitinated proteins by the proteasome
Grice, G. L., & Nathan, J. A. (2016) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00018-016-2255-5 · Cited by 369
Self-citationAlquezar, C., Arya, S., & Kao, A. W. (2021) · Frontiers in Neurology · doi:10.3389/fneur.2020.595532 · Cited by 367
Metadata
- Authors
- Nathan, J. A., Tae Kim, H., Ting, L., Gygi, S. P., & Goldberg, A. L.
- Venue
- The EMBO Journal
- Published
- 2013-01-11
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 552-565
- ISSN
- 0261-4189 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2075
- OpenAlex
- W2052302154
- Cited by
- 253
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Why do cellular proteins linked to K63‐polyubiquitin chains not associate with proteasomes? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/emboj.2012.354
- The paper
- Nathan, J. A., Tae Kim, H., Ting, L., Gygi, S. P., & Goldberg, A. L. (2013). Why do cellular proteins linked to K63‐polyubiquitin chains not associate with proteasomes? The EMBO Journal. https://doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2012.354
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.