A strategy for combining minor genetic susceptibility genes to improve prediction of disease in type 1 diabetes
Abstract
Genome-wide association studies have identified gene regions associated with type 1 diabetes. The aim of this study was to determine how the combined allele frequency of multiple susceptibility genes can stratify islet autoimmunity and/or type 1 diabetes risk. Children of parents with type 1 diabetes and prospectively followed from birth for the development of islet autoantibodies and diabetes were genotyped for single-nucleotide polymorphisms at 12 type 1 diabetes susceptibility genes (ERBB3, PTPN2, IFIH1, PTPN22, KIAA0350, CD25, CTLA4, SH2B3, IL2, IL18RAP, IL10 and COBL). Non-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) risk score was defined by the total number of risk alleles at these genes. Receiver operator curve analysis showed that the non-HLA gene combinations were highly effective in discriminating diabetes and most effective in children with a high-risk HLA genotype. The greatest diabetes discrimination was obtained by the sum of risk alleles for eight genes (IFIH1, CTLA4, PTPN22, IL18RAP, SH2B3, KIAA0350, COBL and ERBB3) in the HLA-risk children. Non-HLA-risk allele scores stratified risk for developing islet autoantibodies and diabetes, and progression from islet autoimmunity to diabetes. Genotyping at multiple susceptibility loci in children from affected families can identify neonates with sufficient genetic risk of type 1 diabetes to be considered for early intervention.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Efforts are underway to assign specific phenotypes to genotypes and to improve understanding of the genetic risk for type 1 diabetes by genotyping at multiple susceptibility loci.
“Efforts are underway to assign specific phenotypes to genotypes, and to improve understanding of the genetic risk for type 1 diabetes by genotyping at multiple susceptibility loci.154”
From Type 1 diabetes (2014) · cites this paper as [154]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 24 · Cited by 68
- Authors
- Winkler, C., Krumsiek, J., Lempainen, J., Achenbach, P., Grallert, H., Giannopoulou, E., Bunk, M., Theis, F. J., Bonifacio, E., & Ziegler, A.-G.
- Affiliations
- TUM Klinikum (DE)
- Helmholtz Munich (DE)
- University of Turku (FI)
- Center for Regenerative Therapies Dresden (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Bonifacio, E
- Ziegler, A-G
- ORCID
- Venue
- Genes & Immunity
- Published
- 2012-08-30
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 549-555
- ISSN
- 1466-4879 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-5470
- OpenAlex
- W2056911105
- Cited by
- 68
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 4.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Genes and Immunity (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- mediaTUM – the media and publications repository of the Technical University Munich (Technical University Munich) (submittedVersion)
- Site cant be reached (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
- Keywords
- type 1 diabetes, susceptibility genes, islet autoimmunity, islet autoantibodies, PTPN22, CTLA-4, MDA5, IL18RAP, SH2B3, HER3, interleukin-2, IL-10, early intervention, disease prediction
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Child, Child, Preschool, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Gene Frequency, HLA Antigens, Humans, Infant, Prospective Studies, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Young Adult, Genetic Loci
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review