Cited by 37Virus-based gene therapy researchRetinal Development and DisordersRNA Interference and Gene Delivery

Reduced retinal transduction and enhanced transgene-directed immunogenicity with intravitreal delivery of rAAV following posterior vitrectomy in dogs

Open access
Boyd, R F, Boye, S L, Conlon, T J, Erger, K E, Sledge, D G, Langohr, I M, Hauswirth, W W, Komáromy, A M +3 more·2016·Gene Therapy

Abstract

Adeno-associated virus (AAV) vector-based gene therapy is a promising treatment strategy for delivery of neurotrophic transgenes to retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) in glaucoma patients. Retinal distribution of transgene expression following intravitreal injection (IVT) of AAV is variable in animal models and the vitreous humor may represent a barrier to initial vector penetration. The primary goal of our study was to investigate the effect of prior core vitrectomy with posterior hyaloid membrane peeling on pattern and efficiency of transduction of a capsid amino acid substituted AAV2 vector, carrying the green fluorescent protein (GFP) reporter transgene following IVT in dogs. When progressive intraocular inflammation developed starting 4 weeks post IVT, the study plan was modified to allow detailed characterization of the etiology as a secondary goal. Unexpectedly, surgical vitrectomy was found to significantly limit transduction, whereas in non-vitrectomized eyes transduction efficiency reached upwards to 37.3% of RGC layer cells. The developing retinitis was characterized by mononuclear cell infiltrates resulting from a delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction, which we suspect was directed at the GFP transgene. Our results, in a canine large animal model, support caution when considering surgical vitrectomy before IVT for retinal gene therapy in patients, as prior vitrectomy appears to significantly reduce transduction efficiency and may predispose the patient to development of vector-induced immune reactions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/gt.2016.31

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies in large animals (NHP and canine) demonstrate activation of retinal APCs, similar immune cell infiltrates and locally increased levels of classic type 1 cytokines (IFNγ, TNFα, CXCL10) in eyes treated with intravitreal and subretinal AAV vectors.

    “This is supported by studies in large animals (NHP and canine) demonstrating activation of retinal APCs, similar immune cell infiltrates and locally increased levels of classic type 1 cytokines (IFNγ , TNFα , CXCL10) in eyes treated with intravitreal and subretinal AAV vectors (Vandenberghe et al., 2011; Boyd et al., 2016; Reichel et al., 2017; Timmers et al., 2020).”

    From Gene Therapy-Associated Uveitis (GTAU): Understanding and mitigating the adverse immune response in retinal gene therapy (2025) · cites this paper as Boyd et al., 2016

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 42 · Cited by 37

Authors
Boyd, R. F., Boye, S. L., Conlon, T. J., Erger, K. E., Sledge, D. G., Langohr, I. M., Hauswirth, W. W., Komáromy, A. M., Boye, S. E., Petersen-Jones, S. M., & Bartoe, J. T.
Affiliations
  • Michigan State University (US)
  • University of Florida Health (US)
Venue
Gene Therapy
Published
2016-04-07
Volume
23
Issue
6
Pages
548-556
ISSN
  • 0969-7128 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5462
OpenAlex
W2332857514
Cited by
37
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1
FWCI
1.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Gene Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Civil War Book Review (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Research to Prevent Blindness
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Eye Institute (P30EY021721, R24EY022023, R01EY017549, R24EY022012, R01EY024280, R01EY019304)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Virus-based gene therapy research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinal Development and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
Keywords
adeno-associated virus vectors, intravitreal gene therapy, posterior vitrectomy, vitreous humor, retinal transduction, retinal ganglion cells, glaucoma, GFP reporter, delayed-type hypersensitivity, retinal inflammation, canine model
MeSH terms
Dependovirus, Animals, Dogs, Genetic Vectors, Humans, Retina, Transduction, Genetic, Vitrectomy, Transgenes, Green Fluorescent Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review