The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Genome-wide prediction models that incorporate de novo GWAS are a powerful new tool for tropical rice improvement
Open accessAbstract
To address the multiple challenges to food security posed by global climate change, population growth and rising incomes, plant breeders are developing new crop varieties that can enhance both agricultural productivity and environmental sustainability. Current breeding practices, however, are unable to keep pace with demand. Genomic selection (GS) is a new technique that helps accelerate the rate of genetic gain in breeding by using whole-genome data to predict the breeding value of offspring. Here, we describe a new GS model that combines RR-BLUP with markers fit as fixed effects selected from the results of a genome-wide-association study (GWAS) on the RR-BLUP training data. We term this model GS + de novo GWAS. In a breeding population of tropical rice, GS + de novo GWAS outperformed six other models for a variety of traits and in multiple environments. On the basis of these results, we propose an extended, two-part breeding design that can be used to efficiently integrate novel variation into elite breeding populations, thus expanding genetic diversity and enhancing the potential for sustainable productivity gains.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Finding Groups in Data: An Introduction to Cluster Analysis
Kaufman, L., & Rousseeuw, P. J. (1990) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/9780470316801 · Cited by 7,344 · cited 1×
“To control for this possibility when designing our folds, we performed a partitioning around k-medoids analysis (pamk) using the R fpc package (function pamk; https://cran.r-project. org/web/packages/fpc/index.html) with the 73 147 imputed SNPs (Hennig, 2015; Kaufman and Rousseeuw, 1990).”
MethodGenome-wide efficient mixed-model analysis for association studies
Zhou, X., & Stephens, M. (2012) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.2310 · Cited by 3,627 · cited 1×
“Run GWAS using Genome-wide Efficient Mixed Model Association (GEMMA) five times, once for each validation fold (Zhou and Stephens, 2012).”
MethodRidge Regression and Other Kernels for Genomic Selection with R Package rrBLUP
Endelman, J. B. (2011) · The Plant Genome · doi:10.3835/plantgenome2011.08.0024 · Cited by 2,094
Gianola, D., & van Kaam, J. B. C. H. M. (2008) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.107.084285 · Cited by 457
Zhang, X., Pérez-Rodríguez, P., Semagn, K., Beyene, Y., Babu, R., López-Cruz, M. A., San Vicente, F., Olsen, M., Buckler, E., Jannink, J.-L., et al. (2015) · Heredity · doi:10.1038/hdy.2014.99 · Cited by 212
Self-citation
Cited by
Enhancing genetic gain in the era of molecular breeding
Xu, Y., Li, P., Zou, C., Lu, Y., Xie, C., Zhang, X., Prasanna, B. M., & Olsen, M. S. (2017) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erx135 · Cited by 336
Enhancing Genetic Gain through Genomic Selection: From Livestock to Plants
Xu, Y., Liu, X., Fu, J., Wang, H., Wang, J., Huang, C., Prasanna, B. M., Olsen, M. S., Wang, G., & Zhang, A. (2020) · Plant Communications · doi:10.1016/j.xplc.2019.100005 · Cited by 281
Metadata
- Authors
- Spindel, J. E., Begum, H., Akdemir, D., Collard, B., Redoña, E., Jannink, J.-L., & McCouch, S.
- Venue
- Heredity
- Published
- 2016-02-10
- Volume
- 116
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 395-408
- ISSN
- 0018-067X (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2540
- OpenAlex
- W2258788146
- Cited by
- 352
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 24.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genome-wide prediction models that incorporate de novo GWAS are a powerful new tool for tropical rice improvement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/hdy.2015.113
- The paper
- Spindel, J. E., Begum, H., Akdemir, D., Collard, B., Redoña, E., Jannink, J.-L., & McCouch, S. (2016). Genome-wide prediction models that incorporate de novo GWAS are a powerful new tool for tropical rice improvement. Heredity. https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.2015.113
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.