Thrift: a guide to thrifty genes, thrifty phenotypes and thrifty norms
Abstract
There is a growing interest in evolutionary models of human adiposity. Frequent reference has been made to 'thrifty genes' or 'thrifty phenotypes', referring to a variety of metabolic or behavioural traits that in one or the other way imply frugality in the expenditure or storage of energy. However, there is confusion over how the strategy of thrift has been incorporated into human biology. At the broadest level, humans represent a thrifty species relative to other mammals, indicating that metabolic adaptations had a crucial role in the emergence of the Homo lineage, in particular in buffering reproduction from ecological stochasticity. In contemporary humans, some variability in adiposity may be attributable to genotypes systematically favoured in certain ecological settings. Genetic variability is also present within populations, and may be considered bet hedging (distributing risk across offspring to increase parental fitness). Bet hedging is an alternative to genetic drift for accounting for genetic variability in the absence of strong selective pressures. Contrasting with genetic variability emerging over the long-term, thrifty phenotypes represent a response to short-term ecological variability. Physiological plasticity allows the emergence of variability across the life course in response to ecological cues experienced directly or by very recent ancestors. Finally, cultural norms or individual preferences allow voluntary behavioural manipulation of thrift in individuals. Overall, there is a range of factors and processes both favouring and opposing thrifty genes, which may reflect moderate bet hedging rather than systematic adaptation. Plasticity protects the genome from selective pressures by tailoring the organism to ongoing ecological conditions. The fact that obesity can occur in different individuals through different genotypes, life histories and behaviours indicates that different treatments are also likely to be required.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Weight loss via caloric restriction faces difficulties including an evolution-engendered guard against low fat mass and a propensity to increase caloric efficiency during dieting.
“Even weight loss via caloric restriction faces difficulties, including an evolution-engendered guard against low fat mass [7, 31] and the propensity of the body to increase caloric efficiency during dieting [32, 33].”
From Regulation of obesity and insulin resistance by nitric oxide (2014) · cites this paper as [31]
The human body is designed to defend against a lower bound of fat content.
“While there is an active debate surrounding the mechanisms underlying this process 8,9, most agree that the human body is designed to defend against a lower bound of fat content.”
From Cellular bioenergetics as a target for obesity therapy (2010) · cites this paper as [8]
Mammals are designed to guard against starvation.
“First, mammals are designed to guard against starvation.”
From Cellular bioenergetics as a target for obesity therapy (2010) · cites this paper as [8]
Redundant systems are in place to overcome any one pathway to appetite suppression, suggesting that a drug acting by one principal mechanism may be unlikely to have long-term efficacy.
“Therefore, redundant systems are in place to overcome any one pathway to appetite suppression, suggesting that a drug acting by one principal mechanism may be unlikely to have long-term efficacy.”
From Cellular bioenergetics as a target for obesity therapy (2010) · cites this paper as [8]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 76 · Cited by 90
- Authors
- Wells, J. C. K.
- Affiliations
- University College London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Wells, J C K
- ORCID
- Wells, J C K
- Venue
- International Journal of Obesity
- Published
- 2009-09-15
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1331-1338
- ISSN
- 0307-0565 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-5497
- OpenAlex
- W2047216622
- Cited by
- 90
- References
- 76
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 1.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- International Journal of Obesity (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Birth, Development, and Health
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease
- Keywords
- thrifty genes, thrifty phenotype, obesity, bet-hedging, genetic drift, physiological plasticity, life course, ecological variation, cultural norms, energy expenditure, metabolic adaptation, gene-environment interaction
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Physiological, Energy Metabolism, Humans, Phenotype, Selection, Genetic, Genetic Variation, Adiposity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review