Cited by 222Birth, Development, and HealthEpigenetics and DNA MethylationGenetic Syndromes and Imprinting

Epigenetic Changes in Early Life and Future Risk of Obesity

Lillycrop, K A, Burdge, G C·2011·International Journal of Obesity

Abstract

The rapid increase in incidence of obesity over the past two decades cannot be explained solely by genetic and adult lifestyle factors. There is now considerable evidence that the fetal and early postnatal environments also strongly influence the risk of developing obesity in later life. Initially, human studies showed that low birth weight was associated with an increased risk of obesity but increasingly there is evidence that overnutrition in the early life can also increase susceptibility to future obesity. These findings have now been replicated in animal models, which have shown that both maternal under- and overnutrition can induce persistent changes in gene expression and metabolism. The mechanism by which the maternal nutritional environment induces such changes is beginning to be understood and involves the altered epigenetic regulation of specific genes. In this review, we discuss the recent evidence that shows that early-life environment can induce altered epigenetic regulation leading to the induction of an altered phenotype. The demonstration of a role for altered epigenetic regulation of genes in the developmental induction of obesity opens the possibility that interventions, either through nutrition or specific drugs, may modify long-term obesity risk and combat this rapid rise in obesity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ijo.2010.122

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 119 · Cited by 222

Authors
Lillycrop, K. A., & Burdge, G. C.
Affiliations
University of Southampton (GB)
Corresponding author
Lillycrop, K A
Venue
International Journal of Obesity
Published
2010-06-15
Volume
35
Issue
1
Pages
72-83
ISSN
  • 0307-0565 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5497
OpenAlex
W2079926361
Cited by
222
References
119
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 30
FWCI
3.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Obesity (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Birth, Development, and Health
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Syndromes and Imprinting
Keywords
epigenetic regulation, early life environment, obesity risk, low birth weight, maternal undernutrition, maternal overnutrition, fetal programming, postnatal nutrition, gene expression, metabolism, obesity prevention
MeSH terms
Animals, Female, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Male, Obesity, Pregnancy, Risk Factors, DNA Methylation, Prenatal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena, Epigenesis, Genetic, Fetal Development, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review