RETRACTED ARTICLE: Correlation between body mass index and gut concentrations of Lactobacillus reuteri, Bifidobacterium animalis, Methanobrevibacter smithii and Escherichia coli
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Genus and species level analysis is the best way to characterize alterations in the human gut microbiota that are associated with obesity, because the clustering of obese and lean microbiotas increases with the taxonomic depth of the analysis. Bifidobacterium genus members have been associated with a lean status, whereas different Lactobacillus species are associated both with a lean and an obese status. OBJECTIVES AND METHODS: We analyzed the fecal concentrations of Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, Methanobrevibacter smithii, the genus Lactobacillus, five other Lactobacillus species previously linked with lean or obese populations, Escherichia coli and Bifidobacterium animalis in 263 individuals, including 134 obese, 38 overweight, 76 lean and 15 anorexic subjects to test for the correlation between bacterial concentration and body mass index (BMI). Of these subjects, 137 were used in our previous study. FINDINGS: Firmicutes were found in >98.5%, Bacteroidetes in 67%, M. smithii in 64%, E. coli in 51%, Lactobacillus species between 17 and 25% and B. animalis in 11% of individuals. The fecal concentration of Lactobacillus reuteri was positively correlated with BMI (coefficient=0.85; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.12-0.58; P=0.02) in agreement with what was reported for Lactobacillus sakei. As reported, B. animalis (coefficient=-0.84; 95% CI -1.61 to -0.07; P=0.03) and M. smithii (coefficient=-0.43, 95% CI -0.90 to 0.05; P=0.08) were negatively associated with the BMI. Unexpectedly, E. coli was found here for the first time to negatively correlate with the BMI (coefficient=-1.05; 95% CI -1.60 to -0.50; P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Our findings confirm the specificity of the obese microbiota and emphasize the correlation between the concentration of certain Lactobacillus species and obesity.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
B. animalis is a probiotic species positively associated with longevity in mice and negatively correlated with inflammation and human obesity.
“B. animalis, a probiotic species positively associated with longevity in mice [78] and negatively correlated with inflammation and human obesity [81]”
From Fecal microbiota transfer between young and aged mice reverses hallmarks of the aging gut, eye, and brain (2022) · cites this paper as [81]
Members of the Bifidobacteriaceae, Akkermansiaceae, and Eubacteriaceae families are associated with beneficial effects on intestinal and extra-intestinal health in both mice and humans.
“Members of the Bifidobacteriaceae, Akkermansiaceae, and Eubacteriaceae families that are associated with beneficial effects on intestinal and extra-intestinal health in both mice and humans”
From Fecal microbiota transfer between young and aged mice reverses hallmarks of the aging gut, eye, and brain (2022) · cites this paper as [81]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 40 · Cited by 362
- Authors
- Million, M., Angelakis, E., Maraninchi, M., Henry, M., Giorgi, R., Valero, R., Vialettes, B., & Raoult, D.
- Affiliations
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Inserm (FR)
- Hôpital de la Timone (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Raoult, D
- Venue
- International Journal of Obesity
- Published
- 2013-03-05
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1460-1466
- ISSN
- 0307-0565 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-5497
- PMC
- PMC3826031
- OpenAlex
- W2017879525
- Cited by
- 362
- References
- 40
- Citations by year
- 2025: 9 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 7
- FWCI
- 10.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Status
- Retracted
- Update notices
- retraction (2024-06-21)
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- International Journal of Obesity (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Infant Nutrition and Health
- Keywords
- body mass index, gut microbiota, Lactobacillus reuteri, Bifidobacterium animalis, Methanobrevibacter smithii, Escherichia coli, Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, anorexia nervosa, overweight, Lactobacillus sakei
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Anorexia Nervosa, Bifidobacterium, Cells, Cultured, Escherichia coli, Feces, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Surveys and Questionnaires, Thinness, Body Mass Index, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction, Methanobrevibacter, Gastrointestinal Tract, Limosilactobacillus reuteri
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review