The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Soil eukaryotic functional diversity, a metatranscriptomic approach
Abstract
To appreciate the functional diversity of communities of soil eukaryotic micro-organisms we evaluated an experimental approach based on the construction and screening of a cDNA library using polyadenylated mRNA extracted from a forest soil. Such a library contains genes that are expressed by each of the different organisms forming the community and represents its metatranscriptome. The diversity of the organisms that contributed to this library was evaluated by sequencing a portion of the 18S rDNA gene amplified from either soil DNA or reverse-transcribed RNA. More than 70% of the sequences were from fungi and unicellular eukaryotes (protists) while the other most represented group was the metazoa. Calculation of richness estimators suggested that more than 180 species could be present in the soil samples studied. Sequencing of 119 cDNA identified genes with no homologues in databases (32%) and genes coding proteins involved in different biochemical and cellular processes. Surprisingly, the taxonomic distribution of the cDNA and of the 18S rDNA genes did not coincide, with a marked under-representation of the protists among the cDNA. Specific genes from such an environmental cDNA library could be isolated by expression in a heterologous microbial host, Saccharomyces cerevisiae. This is illustrated by the functional complementation of a histidine auxotrophic yeast mutant by two cDNA originating possibly from an ascomycete and a basidiomycete fungal species. Study of the metatranscriptome has the potential to uncover adaptations of whole microbial communities to local environmental conditions. It also gives access to an abundant source of genes of biotechnological interest.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Environmental genome shotgun sequencing of the sargasso sea
Venter, J. C., Remington, K., Heidelberg, J. F., Halpern, A. L., Rusch, D., Eisen, J. A., Wu, D., Paulsen, I., Nelson, K. E., Nelson, W., et al. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1093857 · Cited by 4,376
Community structure and metabolism through reconstruction of microbial genomes from the environment
Tyson, G. W., Chapman, J., Hugenholtz, P., Allen, E. E., Ram, R. J., Richardson, P. M., Solovyev, V. V., Rubin, E. M., Rokhsar, D. S., & Banfield, J. F. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02340 · Cited by 2,417
Cited by
Past, present and future of soil quality indices: a biological perspective
Bastida, F., Zsolnay, A., Hernández, T., & García, C. (2008) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2008.08.007 · Cited by 730
Forest microbiome: diversity, complexity and dynamics
Baldrian, P. (2016) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1093/femsre/fuw040 · Cited by 710
Wooley, J. C., Godzik, A., & Friedberg, I. (2010) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000667 · Cited by 688
RNA-seq: from technology to biology
Marguerat, S., & Bähler, J. (2010) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00018-009-0180-6 · Cited by 531
BAIRD, D. J., & HAJIBABAEI, M. (2012) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2012.05519.x · Cited by 502
Metadata
- Authors
- Bailly, J., Fraissinet-Tachet, L., Verner, M.-C., Debaud, J.-C., Lemaire, M., Wésolowski-Louvel, M., & Marmeisse, R.
- Venue
- The ISME Journal
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2007-09-20
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 632-642
- ISSN
- 1751-7362 (ISSN-L)
- 1751-7370
- OpenAlex
- W2011365171
- Cited by
- 267
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Soil eukaryotic functional diversity, a metatranscriptomic approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/ismej.2007.68
- The paper
- Bailly, J., Fraissinet-Tachet, L., Verner, M.-C., Debaud, J.-C., Lemaire, M., Wésolowski-Louvel, M., & Marmeisse, R. (2007). Soil eukaryotic functional diversity, a metatranscriptomic approach. The ISME Journal. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2007.68
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.