The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Relationship between N-cycling communities and ecosystem functioning in a 50-year-old fertilization experiment
Abstract
The relative importance of size and composition of microbial communities in ecosystem functioning is poorly understood. Here, we investigated how community composition and size of selected functional guilds in the nitrogen cycle correlated with agroecosystem functioning, which was defined as microbial process rates, total crop yield and nitrogen content in the crop. Soil was sampled from a 50-year fertilizer trial and the treatments comprised unfertilized bare fallow, unfertilized with crop, and plots with crop fertilized with calcium nitrate, ammonium sulfate, solid cattle manure or sewage sludge. The size of the functional guilds and the total bacterial community were greatly affected by the fertilization regimes, especially by the sewage sludge and ammonium sulfate treatments. The community size results were combined with previously published data on the composition of the corresponding communities, potential ammonia oxidation, denitrification, basal and substrate-induced respiration rates, in addition to crop yield for an integrated analysis. It was found that differences in size, rather than composition, correlated with differences in process rates for the denitrifier and ammonia-oxidizing archaeal and total bacterial communities, whereas neither differences in size nor composition was correlated with differences in process rates for the ammonia-oxidizing bacterial community. In contrast, the composition of nitrate-reducing, denitrifying and total bacterial communities co-varied with primary production and both were strongly linked to soil properties.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dalapicolla, J., do Prado, J. R., Percequillo, A. R., & Knowles, L. L. (2021) · Journal of Biogeography · doi:10.1111/jbi.14281 · Cited by 11,461
R: A Language for Data Analysis and Graphics
Ihaka, R., & Gentleman, R. (1996) · Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics · doi:10.1080/10618600.1996.10474713 · Cited by 11,220
EFFECTS OF BIODIVERSITY ON ECOSYSTEM FUNCTIONING: A CONSENSUS OF CURRENT KNOWLEDGE
Hooper, D. U., Chapin, F. S., Ewel, J. J., Hector, A., Inchausti, P., Lavorel, S., Lawton, J. H., Lodge, D. M., Loreau, M., Naeem, S., et al. (2005) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.1890/04-0922 · Cited by 8,046
The diversity and biogeography of soil bacterial communities
Fierer, N., & Jackson, R. B. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0507535103 · Cited by 5,711
EVOLUTION AND MEASUREMENT OF SPECIES DIVERSITY
Whittaker, R. H. (1972) · TAXON · doi:10.2307/1218190 · Cited by 5,445
Rebuilding community ecology from functional traits
MCGILL, B., ENQUIST, B., WEIHER, E., & WESTOBY, M. (2006) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2006.02.002 · Cited by 4,631
Archaea predominate among ammonia-oxidizing prokaryotes in soils
Leininger, S., Urich, T., Schloter, M., Schwark, L., Qi, J., Nicol, G. W., Prosser, J. I., Schuster, S. C., & Schleper, C. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04983 · Cited by 2,497
Self-citationSørensen, T. B., Sorensen, T., Biering-Sørensen, T., Ti, S., & Sorensen, J. (1948) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,066
Ammonia-Oxidizing Bacteria: A Model for Molecular Microbial Ecology
Kowalchuk, G. A., & Stephen, J. R. (2001) · Annual Review of Microbiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.micro.55.1.485 · Cited by 1,351
Nicol, G. W., Leininger, S., Schleper, C., & Prosser, J. I. (2008) · Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2008.01701.x · Cited by 1,306
Cited by
Ecological intensification: harnessing ecosystem services for food security
Bommarco, R., Kleijn, D., & Potts, S. G. (2013) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2012.10.012 · Cited by 1,862
Saggar, S., Jha, N., Deslippe, J., Bolan, N. S., Luo, J., Giltrap, D. L., Kim, D.-G., Zaman, M., & Tillman, R. W. (2013) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.11.050 · Cited by 543
Petersen, D. G., Blazewicz, S. J., Firestone, M., Herman, D. J., Turetsky, M., & Waldrop, M. (2012) · Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2011.02679.x · Cited by 466
Gao, B., Yao, H., Li, Y., & Zhu, Y. (2020) · Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry · doi:10.1002/etc.4916 · Cited by 430
Zhou, J., Guan, D., Zhou, B., Zhao, B., Ma, M., Qin, J., Jiang, X., Chen, S., Cao, F., Shen, D., et al. (2015) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.07.005 · Cited by 411
Metadata
- Authors
- Hallin, S., Jones, C. M., Schloter, M., & Philippot, L.
- Venue
- The ISME Journal
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2009-01-15
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 597-605
- ISSN
- 1751-7362 (ISSN-L)
- 1751-7370
- OpenAlex
- W1973005481
- Cited by
- 585
- References
- 33
- FWCI
- 58.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Relationship between N-cycling communities and ecosystem functioning in a 50-year-old fertilization experiment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/ismej.2008.128
- The paper
- Hallin, S., Jones, C. M., Schloter, M., & Philippot, L. (2009). Relationship between N-cycling communities and ecosystem functioning in a 50-year-old fertilization experiment. The ISME Journal. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2008.128
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
