The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Disruption of root carbon transport into forest humus stimulates fungal opportunists at the expense of mycorrhizal fungi
Abstract
Ectomycorrhizal fungi dominate the humus layers of boreal forests. They depend on carbohydrates that are translocated through roots, via fungal mycelium to microsites in the soil, wherein they forage for nutrients. Mycorrhizal fungi are therefore sensitive to disruptive disturbances that may restrict their carbon supply. By disrupting root connections, we induced a sudden decline in mycorrhizal mycelial abundance and studied the consequent effects on growth and activity of free living, saprotrophic fungi and bacteria in pine forest humus, using molecular community analyses in combination with enzyme activity measurements. Ectomycorrhizal fungi had decreased in abundance 14 days after root severing, but the abundance of certain free-living ascomycetes was three times higher within 5 days of the disturbance compared with undisturbed controls. Root disruption also increased laccase production by an order of magnitude and cellulase production by a factor of 5. In contrast, bacterial populations seemed little affected. The results indicate that access to an external carbon source enables mycorrhizal fungi to monopolise the humus, but disturbances may induce rapid growth of opportunistic saprotrophic fungi that presumably use the dying mycorrhizal mycelium. Studies of such functional shifts in fungal communities, induced by disturbance, may shed light on mechanisms behind nutrient retention and release in boreal forests. The results also highlight the fundamental problems associated with methods that study microbial processes in soil samples that have been isolated from living roots.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nitrogen mineralization: Challenges of a changing paradigm
Schimel, J. P., & Bennett, J. (2004) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/03-8002 · Cited by 2,511
Cited by
Fungal community analysis by high‐throughput sequencing of amplified markers – a user's guide
Lindahl, B. D., Nilsson, R. H., Tedersoo, L., Abarenkov, K., Carlsen, T., Kjøller, R., Kõljalg, U., Pennanen, T., Rosendahl, S., Stenlid, J., et al. (2013) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.12243 · Cited by 892
Self-citationForest microbiome: diversity, complexity and dynamics
Baldrian, P. (2016) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1093/femsre/fuw040 · Cited by 710
Fernandez, C. W., & Kennedy, P. G. (2016) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.13648 · Cited by 532
Žifčáková, L., Větrovský, T., Howe, A., & Baldrian, P. (2016) · Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1111/1462-2920.13026 · Cited by 406
Metadata
- Authors
- Lindahl, B. D., de Boer, W., & Finlay, R. D.
- Venue
- The ISME Journal
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2010-03-11
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 872-881
- ISSN
- 1751-7362 (ISSN-L)
- 1751-7370
- OpenAlex
- W2052757363
- Cited by
- 192
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Disruption of root carbon transport into forest humus stimulates fungal opportunists at the expense of mycorrhizal fungi. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/ismej.2010.19
- The paper
- Lindahl, B. D., de Boer, W., & Finlay, R. D. (2010). Disruption of root carbon transport into forest humus stimulates fungal opportunists at the expense of mycorrhizal fungi. The ISME Journal. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2010.19
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.