The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Experimental tests of the bacterial distance–decay relationship
Abstract
Community similarity declines with increasing geographic distance if species tend to be locally adapted or if they are dispersal limited. The distance–decay of similarity has been shown for bacteria previously, but distinguishing between these competing mechanisms is difficult from observational surveys. I found little evidence of a relationship between geographic distance and similarity in community composition in an aquatic bacterial community. When bacterial colonization occurred into initially identical sterile microcosms across a woodland, a strong distance–decay relationship was observed after 28 days, implying that dispersal limitation created a strong pattern in these communities in the absence of environmental differences. This conclusion was not supported by the results of a reciprocal transplant experiment. When microcosms at the extremities of the study area were transplanted to the opposite end of the study area, the communities converged on the community composition at the site to which they were transplanted. This convergence did not depend on whether colonization into the microcosms was prevented, implying a minor role for dispersal limitation over these spatial and temporal scales. Additional manipulations of colonization rates were consistent with the hypothesis that dispersal limitation structured these communities over short time scales (a few days), but that dispersal limitation had a minor role over longer time scales (>7 days).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Non‐parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure
CLARKE, K. R. (1993) · Australian Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1442-9993.1993.tb00438.x · Cited by 14,128
A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance
Anderson, M. J. (2001) · Austral Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1442-9993.2001.01070.pp.x · Cited by 13,828
Nucleic acid techniques in bacterial systematics
Stackebrandt, E. S., & Goodfellow, M. (1991) · Wiley eBooks · Cited by 9,460
Lane, D. (1991) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 8,190
The diversity and biogeography of soil bacterial communities
Fierer, N., & Jackson, R. B. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0507535103 · Cited by 5,711
TOWARD AN ECOLOGICAL CLASSIFICATION OF SOIL BACTERIA
Fierer, N., Bradford, M. A., & Jackson, R. B. (2007) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/05-1839 · Cited by 5,079
Microbial biogeography: putting microorganisms on the map
Martiny, J. B. H., Bohannan, B. J. M., Brown, J. H., Colwell, R. K., Fuhrman, J. A., Green, J. L., Horner-Devine, M. C., Kane, M., Krumins, J. A., Kuske, C. R., et al. (2006) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro1341 · Cited by 3,022
Liu, W. T., Marsh, T. L., Cheng, H., & Forney, L. J. (1997) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.63.11.4516-4522.1997 · Cited by 2,251
The distance decay of similarity in biogeography and ecology
Nekola, J. C., & White, P. S. (1999) · Journal of Biogeography · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2699.1999.00305.x · Cited by 1,908
Marchesi, J. R., Sato, T., Weightman, A. J., Martin, T. A., Fry, J. C., Hiom, S. J., & Wade, W. G. (1998) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.64.2.795-799.1998 · Cited by 1,828
Cited by
Stochastic Community Assembly: Does It Matter in Microbial Ecology?
Zhou, J., & Ning, D. (2017) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.00002-17 · Cited by 2,773
Adams, R. I., Miletto, M., Taylor, J. W., & Bruns, T. D. (2013) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2013.28 · Cited by 939
Metadata
- Authors
- Bell, T.
- Venue
- The ISME Journal
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2010-06-10
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1357-1365
- ISSN
- 1751-7362 (ISSN-L)
- 1751-7370
- OpenAlex
- W2035912475
- Cited by
- 255
- References
- 39
- FWCI
- 11.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Experimental tests of the bacterial distance–decay relationship. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/ismej.2010.77
- The paper
- Bell, T. (2010). Experimental tests of the bacterial distance–decay relationship. The ISME Journal. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2010.77
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.