The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cooperation and cheating in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: the roles of the las, rhl and pqs quorum-sensing systems
Open accessAbstract
Pseudomonas aeruginosa coordinates the transcription of hundreds of genes, including many virulence genes, through three hierarchically arranged quorum-sensing (QS) systems, namely las, rhl and pqs. Each system consists of genes involved in autoinducer synthesis, lasI, rhlI and pqsABCDH, as well as cognate-regulatory genes, lasR, rhlR and pqsR. In this study, we analyzed the social behavior of signal-blind (ΔlasR, ΔrhlR, ΔpqsR) and signal-negative (ΔlasI, ΔrhlI, ΔpqsA) mutants from each QS system. As each system controls extracellular common goods but differs in the extent of regulatory control, we hypothesized that all signal-blind mutants can behave as cheaters that vary in their ability to invade a QS-proficient population. We found that lasR and pqsR, but not rhlR, mutants evolve from a wild-type ancestor in vitro under conditions that favor QS. Accordingly, defined lasR and pqsR mutants enriched in wild-type co-culture, whereas rhlR and all signal-negative mutants did not. Both lasR and pqsR mutants enriched with negative frequency dependence, suggesting social interactions with the wild type, although the pqsR mutant also grew well on its own. Taken together, the lasR mutant behaved as a typical cheater, as reported previously. However, the pqsR and rhlR mutants exhibited more complex behaviors, which can be sufficiently explained by positive and negative pleiotropic effects through differential regulation of pqs gene expression in the interconnected QS network. The evolutionary approach adopted here may account for the prevalence of naturally occurring QS mutants.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Targeting virulence: can we make evolution-proof drugs?
Allen, R. C., Popat, R., Diggle, S. P., & Brown, S. P. (2014) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro3232 · Cited by 532
Self-citationControl of bacterial metabolism by quorum sensing
Goo, E., An, J. H., Kang, Y., & Hwang, I. (2015) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.tim.2015.05.007 · Cited by 155
Metadata
- Authors
- Wilder, C. N., Diggle, S. P., & Schuster, M.
- Venue
- The ISME Journal
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-03-03
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1332-1343
- ISSN
- 1751-7362 (ISSN-L)
- 1751-7370
- OpenAlex
- W2007213363
- Cited by
- 223
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cooperation and cheating in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: the roles of the las, rhl and pqs quorum-sensing systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/ismej.2011.13
- The paper
- Wilder, C. N., Diggle, S. P., & Schuster, M. (2011). Cooperation and cheating in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: the roles of the las, rhl and pqs quorum-sensing systems. The ISME Journal. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2011.13
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.